Put and . Suppose first that . The Itô formula for , which is twice continuously differentiable for , gives
For , the second derivative is interpreted as the constant . The stochastic term has mean zero: its integrand is bounded, and makes it a square-integrable martingale. Consequently
This is the first required estimate.
A bounded local martingale is a true martingale. Apply the allowed Doob Lp maximal inequality, and then Hölder's inequality with conjugate exponents and for . With , this yields
If the left side is zero there is nothing to prove; otherwise divide by its indicated power and raise to . For , the same conclusion follows directly from and Doob's inequality. A usable constant is therefore
In particular . This is the upper maximal moment bound for a continuous local martingale.
For an unbounded continuous local martingale, stop at . Its stopped path is bounded, and its bracket at is . The proved inequality gives a bound by , independent of . Continuity makes , and the stopped maxima increase to . Monotone convergence proves the same inequality for the original unbounded process, with the same constant. This localization step also shows that the assumed bracket moments supply all the needed maximal moments.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.