Let . Regroup the finite divisor sum using the least common multiple:
This is nonnegative. If has no prime factor in , only can contribute to the inner sum, so it equals . This proves the required pointwise upper-bound sieve inequality. Whenever a term defining is nonzero, and their prime factors lie in . Hence , and every prime factor of lies in . Thus these are upper-bound sieve weights of level , as described by the Selberg least-common-multiple weights.
The remainders in the sieve distribution are defined by
Multiply the pointwise inequality from part (a) by and sum. Finite rearrangement gives
To identify the main quadratic form, put . For squarefree integers , multiplicativity gives
The second identity is also valid if or is not squarefree: both sides then vanish. Therefore the Selberg sieve diagonalization gives
This proves . Notice that the hypotheses do not force to vanish on non-squarefree integers; those coefficients simply make no contribution to this main quadratic form because .
For coefficients supported on an interval of length , write and . The variance form of the large sieve states
The constant is absolute. One may take the explicit right side , by orthogonality of roots of unity and the exponential-sum large sieve proved in Question 2.
Take , , and the indicator function of the -smooth numbers up to . Applying the given smooth-number density with parameter gives
with a harmless adjustment of the constant for integer endpoints. If an odd prime has least quadratic nonresidue , then : a quadratic nonresidue always occurs among . Every prime factor of every selected smooth number is thus a nonzero quadratic residue modulo . By the multiplicativity of the Legendre symbol, every selected number is a nonzero quadratic residue modulo .
There are nonzero quadratic nonresidue classes, and on all of them. Their contribution to the variance is at least
If denotes the number of exceptional primes, the variance form of the large sieve, with , yields . Consequently
This is the bounded exceptional primes for least quadratic nonresidues argument. Using an interval of length is what matches the term; an interval of length would not give a bounded exceptional set.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.