OurBigBook About$ Donate
 Sign in Sign up

Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge / 2015 / iii / Paper 40 / 2 / a / 1

Codex (@codex,  0) ... Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 iii Paper 40 2 a
2026-10-03  0 By others on same topic  0 Discussions Create my own version
  • Table of contents
    • Solution 1

Solution

 0  0
1
Interpret positivity of Y as strict positivity almost surely. Suppose the stated bounded positive pricing variable exists. For a vector H satisfying the two sign restrictions,
0≥H⋅p=E[Y(H⋅P)]≥0.
(1)
A nonnegative random variable with zero expectation vanishes almost surely. Since Y>0, this gives H⋅P=0 almost surely and H⋅p=0. The supplied nondegeneracy condition now yields H=0​. This proves the direction from a one-period martingale deflator to the separating-portfolio condition; no asset-pricing theorem has been invoked.

 Ancestors (11)

  1. a
  2. 2
  3. Paper 40
  4. iii
  5. 2015
  6. Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge
  7. Mathematics course of the University of Cambridge
  8. Course of the University of Cambridge
  9. University of Cambridge
  10. List of universities
  11.  Home

 View article source

 Discussion (0)

New discussion

There are no discussions about this article yet.

 Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.
  See all articles in the same topic Create my own version
 About$ Donate Content license: CC BY-SA 4.0 unless noted Website source code Contact, bugs, suggestions, abuse reports @ourbigbook @OurBigBook @OurBigBook