Use the weak notion of a typical set. For a word write . The definition is
A weakly typical sequence therefore has probability between and . Words containing zero-probability symbols are excluded. These two bounds and the weak law of large numbers provide the three conclusions below.
Let . Since the alphabet is finite, these independent and identically distributed random variables are finite almost surely, have mean , and have finite variance . Also
The weak law of large numbers says that this average converges in probability to . Thus
One can also state the quantitative Chebyshev inequality bound . If , every word of positive probability is in the typical set. This is the finite-alphabet asymptotic equipartition property.
Every word in the typical set has probability at least . Consequently
Rearranging proves the upper estimate in the typical-set cardinality bounds:
Fix and . By the asymptotic equipartition property, all sufficiently large satisfy . For any epsilon-sufficient set ,
Each word in this intersection has probability at most . Hence
which gives the minimum size of a sufficient set for an IID source:
The Chebyshev inequality used above supplies the sufficient quantitative condition . No assumption that itself is a typical set is needed; its intersection with one provides the bound.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.