A flasque sheaf has surjective restriction maps for every pair of opens . To prove the claim for an injective sheaf of modules, let and . The natural mapis a monomorphism: its stalks are either the identity on , the map from zero to that stalk, or the zero-to-zero map. Here is extension by zero for module sheaves.
The extension-by-zero adjunction identifiesThe injective object property extends every morphism from to one from . Under the displayed identification this is exactly surjectivity of . Injective module sheaves are therefore flasque. This argument works on an arbitrary ringed space, without Noetherian or separation assumptions.
For the closed inclusion , the direct image sheaf has stalk at and zero stalk at points outside : outside the closed set there is an open neighbourhood disjoint from . Hence is exact, since exact sequences of sheaves are detected on stalks.
Take a flasque resolution . Direct image preserves flasqueness, because restrictions are the restrictions on inverse-image opens. Exactness makes a flasque resolution of . MoreoverThe complexes computing sheaf cohomology are identical. ThereforeThis is sheaf cohomology under a closed inclusion; the closedness hypothesis is used in the exactness of direct image.
For a point and an abelian group , the skyscraper sheaf , with , isRestrictions are identities or the map to zero, so it is a flasque sheaf. The global sections equal and higher cohomology vanishes:No closed-point assumption is needed for this calculation of skyscraper sheaf cohomology. On an arbitrary topological space, its nonzero stalks are at points of when ; only for a closed point is the nonzero stalk confined to .
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.