The formal character of a weight module is , where are formal basis symbols in the group algebra of the weight lattice, satisfying . For a finite-dimensional irreducible highest-weight representation, the highest weight has weight multiplicity one. Another standard result is that weight multiplicities are invariant under the Weyl group: .
A minuscule representation has all its weights in a single Weyl group orbit. Since the highest weight is present, that orbit is , and the invariance just stated shows every point of it is present with multiplicity one. Consequently the formal character of a minuscule representation isThe sum is over distinct weights, rather than over all elements of : summing over would count each weight times.
Use the coroot in the pairing. The original PDF retains this mark, which is lost in the local TeX transcription. Fix any positive root , and put . For a dominant integral weight, is a nonnegative integer; positive coroots are nonnegative integral combinations of simple coroots.
Let be a highest-weight vector, and restrict to the sl2 subalgebra associated with a root . It is killed by its raising operator and has eigenvalue . If , its lowering operator produces a nonzero vector: otherwise would vanish. Therefore is a weight.
Choose a Weyl group invariant positive-definite inner product on the real weight space. All weights of a minuscule representation have the same norm, since they belong to . ButIf , this is negative, a contradiction. Thus for every positive root,When , the lower weight is precisely the Weyl reflection , consistent with the orbit condition.
We first prove the useful lemma that dominant root-lattice highest weights have zero weight. Write for the root lattice, and let a dominant integral weight be the highest weight of a finite-dimensional irreducible representation.
First, is a nonnegative integral combination of simple roots. Indeed, write , separating its positive and negative coefficients in the root basis. The two parts have disjoint supports, and distinct simple roots have nonpositive inner product, so . If , thenOn the other hand, dominance gives for each simple root, hence . This contradiction proves .
Now suppose a nonzero weight has all . The identityshows that some satisfies and . We use the standard sl2 Lie algebra fact that its lowering operator is injective on any positive eigenspace in a finite-dimensional representation. This follows from the classification of finite-dimensional sl2 representations: in each irreducible , the only weight killed by the lowering operator is the lowest weight .
Consequently a nonzero vector of weight lowers to a nonzero vector of weight . Its simple-root coefficients remain nonnegative and their sum decreases by one. Starting at , repeated lowering must therefore reach the zero weight. Notice that intermediate weights need not remain dominant; positivity of the chosen coroot pairing is enough at each step.
For a minuscule representation, every weight belongs to , so the zero weight just obtained lies in this orbit. Every Weyl group element is invertible, and forces . This proves that minuscule weights in the root lattice are zero. Under the assumption , every possible highest weight lies in , henceHere is the one-dimensional trivial Lie algebra representation, by the classification of finite-dimensional irreducible highest-weight representations.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.