For each , the open interval
meets only in . Thus every singleton is open in the subspace topology on . Every subset is the union and is therefore open. Hence the induced topology is the discrete topology:
Because every subset of is open, the Borel sigma-algebra of a discrete space is
If or and is a Borel subset of the codomain, then is some subset of , hence is Borel. Thus every such function is a Borel measurable function.
Equip with counting measure . For a nonnegative function , define
This lies in and agrees with the series as a Lebesgue integral against counting measure.
For , define
when is integrable, which here means
Thus the complex sum is defined under absolute convergence and can be obtained by integrating the real and imaginary parts.
A simple function on is a function with finite range, equivalently
for a finite measurable partition by subsets . Its nonnegative sum is . It is finite exactly when every level set with is finite, equivalently when has finite support after its zero level is discarded.
The Beppo Levi theorem, or monotone convergence theorem, states that if is a sequence of nonnegative measurable functions on a measure space and
pointwise almost everywhere, then is measurable and
where either side may be infinite.
Measurability of follows from measurability of countable suprema. Since , monotonicity of the Lebesgue integral gives
For the reverse inequality, let be a nonnegative simple function with , and fix . Define
Then up to the null set on which convergence fails. Since ,
by continuity from below of a measure, applied to the finitely many level sets of . Hence . Letting and taking the supremum over all simple , as in the definition of the Lebesgue integral, gives the reverse inequality and proves the theorem.
For integer , define . The assumed monotonicity in gives
for every . Apply the monotone convergence theorem on with counting measure:
The function is itself nondecreasing, and the positive integers are cofinal in as , so its limit over real equals its limit over integer . Therefore
Without monotonicity, take
For each fixed , , so the sum of the pointwise limits is zero. At every , however, exactly one term is one, so and its limit is one. This moving-spike obstruction to interchanging a limit and an infinite sum gives the required counterexample.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.