An equivalence relation is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive. Here
The relation is reflexive and symmetric, but it is not transitive. For example, take
The real parts of and are positive, whereas that of is negative. Hence this is not an equivalence relation.
By the equality condition in the complex triangle inequality,
for nonzero exactly when is a positive real number. Having the same complex argument is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive, so this is an equivalence relation. Its classes are the open rays from the origin.
This relation is reflexive because choosing gives . It need not be symmetric: take positive real numbers and . Then is rational, so . But
is transcendental, hence irrational, for every integer . Thus , and the relation is not an equivalence relation.
Set . The relation is exactly
It is therefore the equivalence relation induced by a function: equality of the two function values is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive. Hence this is an equivalence relation.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.