Conservation of volume flux through a circular arc of radius gives
so the outer flow is the sink flow in a sector
This is a potential flow and already satisfies the no-penetration boundary condition on the radial walls. It has nonzero tangential speed there, however, and therefore violates the no-slip boundary condition. Thin vorticity-bearing boundary layers are needed to reduce that speed to zero at each wall.
Along , put and . If is the layer thickness, then
The boundary-layer thickness from an advection-diffusion balance therefore gives
and hence
up to a constant factor absorbed into the similarity coordinate.
Let
Using the Cartesian streamfunction convention , gives
At fixed ,
The terms proportional to cancel, leaving
Since , , while . The boundary-layer equation therefore becomes
Choosing the wall value of the streamfunction as zero, imposing no slip, and matching to give
Set
Writing , direct differentiation gives
On the other hand,
Thus , which is precisely . The far-field condition is automatic because . No slip requires
so
For , decreases directly from to , matching flow everywhere toward the sink. For the negative root, initially becomes positive and creates a reverse-flow region next to the wall. The physically likely choice is therefore

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.