For two body-force-free Stokes flows and in the same domain, the Lorentz reciprocal theorem for Stokes flow is
Indeed, the difference of the two volume integrands is
because both flows are incompressible and the Newtonian fluid stress tensor is symmetric. The divergence theorem proves the boundary identity.
On a rigid body, . The reciprocal theorem becomes
Writing and choosing arbitrary pairs of rigid velocities shows that
Thus the hydrodynamic resistance matrix is symmetric.
The body is invariant under the reflections and half-turns that preserve its -axis. A polar vector force can therefore produce only the polar velocity ; every rotation is excluded because angular velocity is a pseudovector. Hence only is nonzero when and .
For , the surviving symmetry-allowed components are
while vanish. The coupling between translation in and rotation about is permitted because the two horizontal rods lie at opposite vertical offsets.
For pure translation, integrate the slender-body force density over each rod and take its moment about . The three coordinate directions give
Thus
when .
Let
The symmetry proved in part (a) determines the force generated by rotation from the translation-generated couple. Combining this with the given rotational resistance gives the complete matrix
The zero-couple equations in the two coupled horizontal blocks are
and . The force equations then become
Therefore
and
A vector fixed in space has body-frame derivative of a space-fixed vector
Substitution of part (d) gives
If is constant and nonzero, then and are constant and not both zero. Their evolution equations force , and the last equation then gives . Hence
For , both the translational velocity and the angular velocity are parallel to the fixed vertical force, with the latter oppositely directed. The body therefore falls on a straight vertical line while spinning steadily about that line. Its body -axis remains horizontal, and its - and -axes remain at to the vertical.
For the initial condition , symmetry preserves . With the exact body-frame solution is
The body rotates about its -axis, its fall path bends slightly because the horizontal and axial mobilities differ, and . Thus the body -axis becomes vertical and the angular velocity tends to zero; asymptotically it falls without rotating.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.