The infimum of is its greatest lower bound: means that for every , and that every lower bound of satisfies . The supremum is its least upper bound: means that for every , and every upper bound satisfies . The completeness of the real numbers ensures that both exist for a nonempty bounded set of real numbers.
Put . For every , , hence , so is a lower bound of . If is any lower bound of , then for every , making an upper bound of . The definition of supremum gives , or . Thus is the greatest lower bound, and
Let . Every element of the union is at most , so is an upper bound. Conversely, every upper bound of is an upper bound of each of and , hence is at least both suprema and therefore at least . Consequently
True. Write and . All these suprema exist in . Since , we have for every , hence . Conversely, every , so is an upper bound of and . Thus the iterated extrema of an array satisfy
True. Set and . Because , every row infimum satisfies , so . But for all , making a lower bound of . Therefore , and
True. For every ,
Fix . The number is an upper bound for every column infimum, so . This holds for every , making a lower bound of the row suprema. Taking their infimum gives the weak minimax inequality
False. Take for every , and for every and every . Each row is constant, so its infimum and supremum coincide. Nevertheless,
The two outer extrema can select different rows.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.