The infimum of is its greatest lower bound: means that for every , and that every lower bound of satisfies . The supremum is its least upper bound: means that for every , and every upper bound satisfies . The completeness of the real numbers ensures that both exist for a nonempty bounded set of real numbers.
Put . For every , , hence , so is a lower bound of . If is any lower bound of , then for every , making an upper bound of . The definition of supremum gives , or . Thus is the greatest lower bound, and
Let . Every element of the union is at most , so is an upper bound. Conversely, every upper bound of is an upper bound of each of and , hence is at least both suprema and therefore at least . Consequently
True. Write and . All these suprema exist in . Since , we have for every , hence . Conversely, every , so is an upper bound of and . Thus the iterated extrema of an array satisfy
True. Set and . Because , every row infimum satisfies , so . But for all , making a lower bound of . Therefore , and
True. For every ,Fix . The number is an upper bound for every column infimum, so . This holds for every , making a lower bound of the row suprema. Taking their infimum gives the weak minimax inequality
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.