Choose with . Every tail of a sequence is nonempty and bounded, so its supremum exists and lies in . Removing one term cannot increase a supremum, hence . The bounded monotone sequence theorem, applied to , proves
Thus is the limit superior of .
For , eventually , and then . Only finitely many indices can satisfy . If only finitely many satisfied , some entire tail of a sequence would have . Its supremum would also be at most , contradicting .
Inductively choose so late that and . There are infinitely many choices for the latter inequality, so both requirements can be met. Then , proving . This constructs a subsequence attaining the limit superior.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.