Assume (I). Existence of a decomposition is part of the hypothesis. If are two decompositions, multiply on the left by and on the right by to obtain
The left side belongs to and the right side to , since they are subgroups. Their common value belongs to , so and . This proves uniqueness, hence (II).
Conversely, assume (II). Existence immediately gives . If , then
are two allowed factorizations, because the identity is in each subgroup. Uniqueness makes their first components equal, so . Thus and (I) follows.
Therefore (I) and (II) are equivalent. This is an exact factorization of a group. For finite groups it gives , but it does not by itself identify with a direct product of groups; multiplication between the two factors can be noncommutative.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.