Seek a positive weight such that the differential operator becomes . Matching the second derivative gives , while matching the first derivative requires . Consequently
Choosing the multiplicative constant to be one gives
This is Sturm-Liouville form with zero potential term. Multiply the equations for by , subtract, and integrate. The Lagrange identity for a Sturm-Liouville operator gives
The boundary expression vanishes because and the functions and their derivatives are finite. Since are distinct, their eigenvalues are distinct, proving
The endpoint singularities of the weight are integrable, so these weighted inner products exist.
For , a constant solution and its normalization give . For , substitute : the equation gives , and the normalization gives . For , put . Comparing coefficients gives and ; then fixes . Thus
These are the first three Chebyshev polynomials. For their squared weighted norms, use , which converts into :
More generally, makes their orthogonality the usual cosine orthogonality.
Let , so and the forced equation is . The small-parameter Taylor expansion of the forcing is
Each Chebyshev polynomial can be inverted separately under . None of the required denominators vanishes because is a real noninteger. Thus the regular solution of a forced Chebyshev equation has
Here we select the same regular endpoint domain as in part (a), with finite function values and finite endpoint derivatives. This qualification is needed: the printed forced equation alone does not state endpoint conditions. Without this selection one can add , which remain finite but generally have singular endpoint derivatives. With , regularity gives ; the corresponding homogeneous equation has only the zero solution for noninteger . This makes the displayed expansion unique.
Write the integral's multiplier in the Chebyshev polynomial basis:
At , part (i) gives
By orthogonality, the term and all cross terms vanish. Using and , the integral is
The remainder can be integrated against this integrable weight in the regular expansion, so it retains the stated order.
Put in the Laplace equation in polar coordinates. After multiplication by , separation of variables gives
The angular function is -periodic and single-valued, so its nonconstant modes are with integer . Their radial Euler differential equation has solutions ; finiteness at the origin excludes .
The zero angular mode has constant angular part and radial solutions . The logarithmic term is again excluded at the origin. Superposition therefore yields
This is the regular harmonic expansion inside the disk.
On the boundary, integrate the expansion from part (a) over one angular period. Every nonconstant sine and cosine has zero average, so
All positive-power radial terms vanish at , leaving . Hence
This is the mean value property for harmonic functions. It is an average over arclength as well as over angle, since . The usual continuity or integrable-boundary-data hypotheses justify taking this angular average.
Write the boundary Fourier series as . Since , its coefficients obey and . The mean is
For , the integral of on the first semicircle is zero. On the second semicircle, use and cosine orthogonality. This gives and every other .
For the sine coefficients, every even gives zero on both semicircles. For odd , product-to-sum formulas give
Thus the requested radial-expansion coefficients are
For any interior point , choose a sufficiently small circle centred on and wholly inside the disk. Translating the origin does not change the Laplace equation, so part (b) gives
Suppose a real harmonic function, continuous on the closed disk, attains its global maximum at an interior point. Every value on each such circle is at most , and their average is . By continuity, every value on the circle must therefore equal . Varying its radius shows that a neighbourhood of the point also has value .
Thus the set of points attaining is open in the disk, and it is closed by continuity. The disk is connected, so this set must be the whole disk. The function is constant and has the same maximum on the boundary. Otherwise the maximum cannot be interior. Compactness of the closed disk guarantees existence of a maximum, proving the maximum principle for harmonic functions:
Continuity up to the boundary is the standard hypothesis for this attained-maximum formulation.
Use the convention . The Dirichlet Green function for this Poisson equation satisfies, for each source point ,
It is a harmonic function away from its source, with a unit delta singularity there. Its boundary condition is homogeneous even when the original potential has nonzero boundary values; those values enter through the boundary integral. This sign convention is the one giving the plus signs in the formula requested in part (b).
Apply Green's second identity to and , differentiating in :
The volume terms become . On the boundary and , so
Here is the outward normal derivative in the integration variable. One may justify the identity at the singularity by excising a small sphere around ; its unit flux supplies the evaluation .
For , the fundamental solution of the Laplace equation in three dimensions is
Its sign follows from the flux: on a small sphere of radius , its outward radial derivative is , with total flux one.
Let and put the image point at . The method of images gives the Dirichlet Green function inside a sphere:
The image lies outside the ball, so its potential is harmonic inside. On , the identity makes the two terms cancel. The original source retains unit strength. For a source at the centre, take the limit:
Let be reflection of the interior source across the equatorial plane. Using the ball Green's function from part (c), form
Both terms vanish on the unit sphere. On the flat disk , distances to reflected points coincide, and the same is true of their inversion images, so the difference is zero there as well. Only is inside the upper half-ball; the reflected source is in the lower half-ball, and both inversion images lie outside the full ball. Thus there is exactly one interior delta source, of the required strength.
Explicitly, with and stars denoting inversion in the unit sphere,
This is the Dirichlet Green function inside a hemisphere, constructed from four image-source terms.
A sufficient contour setting for both results is a positively oriented, simple, closed, piecewise smooth contour , with the function holomorphic on an open neighbourhood of and its entire interior. The Cauchy integral theorem then states
If is strictly inside , the Cauchy integral formula states
The contour must not pass through . Positive orientation means anticlockwise; reversing it reverses the sign of the contour integral. The holomorphy assumption throughout the interior excludes hidden singularities there.
The only denominator zero is , which lies strictly inside the given circle. The numerator is an entire function. Apply the derivative form of the Cauchy integral formula with :
The sixth derivative is , so its value at is . Consequently
For a positively oriented simple closed contour, the residue theorem states that the integral of a function holomorphic on and inside the contour except at finitely many isolated interior singularities is times the sum of its residues. There must be no singularity on the contour.
Factor the denominator as . For , the upper semicircle encloses the two simple poles
The other two poles are in the lower half-plane. Since ,
Writing and using , , their numerator difference simplifies to
Thus for every the closed-contour integral is
To remove the arc, on we have and . For sufficiently large , the complex line integral estimate gives
The real-line integral is absolutely convergent. Its imaginary part is zero by oddness of . Therefore
A sufficient assumption is that is absolutely continuous, , and at both infinities. Integration by parts in the Fourier transform gives
The decay assumption removes the boundary term, and integrability makes both transforms ordinary convergent integrals. The same derivative identity extends to tempered distributions.
Apply the Fourier transform of a derivative twice to the damped harmonic oscillator equation. Under the corresponding convergence assumptions,
Thus
Since , this denominator has no real zero: its imaginary part could vanish only at , where its real part is positive. The transform therefore defines a regular response on the real frequency axis.
Let , interpreted as in the overdamped case. Factoring the denominator gives
Fourier inversion and the convolution theorem give
where
Thus the requested numerator is
For all positive , both poles lie in the upper half-plane. In the overdamped case their imaginary parts are , both positive. At equality they merge into a double pole.
For , close the inverse-transform contour in the upper half-plane. There ; the rational factor is , so the arc integral vanishes. For , write . The two simple poles are , and the residue theorem yields
This causal Green function of a damped oscillator has damped oscillations with envelope and tends to zero as .
For , put , so and the poles are . Closing in the upper half-plane for again includes both simple poles. The residue theorem gives
This overdamped response has no oscillation. Its slow tail is , and it tends to zero because .
At , the inverse-transform denominator is . For , its upper-half-plane double-pole residue is the derivative of the exponential:
It is also the continuous limit of both answers above as or . This critically damped response tends to zero with a linear factor multiplying the exponential.
In all three cases, for close the contour in the lower half-plane, where decays. There are no poles inside, so
At its continuous value is zero and , producing the unit derivative jump required by . Thus all three formulas are causal Green's functions and all decay to zero at late times.
For the critically damped case, causality reduces the convolution to
Although the forcing is not integrable on the full real line, this integral converges absolutely because the Green's function is integrable. Thus the calculation is valid directly; the corresponding Fourier transform can be interpreted as a tempered distribution.
Use the complex exponential and for :
Since , the convolution response is
This is the bounded steady response to the stated forcing acting for all time. Without an initial condition or the convolution selection, the general solution additionally contains . No switch-on at was specified, so zero initial displacement and velocity should not be imposed on this all-time forcing.
Split the Cartesian second-rank tensor into symmetric and antisymmetric parts:
Define . The symmetric part contributes zero to this contraction. The epsilon-delta identity then gives
Therefore
The symmetric part and the three independent antisymmetric components determine these quantities uniquely. Under proper rotations is a vector; under reflections it is an axial vector.
Apply the symmetric gradient and curl decomposition separately to the electric field and the magnetic field:
The corresponding axial parts are
The second equalities use the vacuum Maxwell equations. Their divergence constraints also show that both symmetric gradient tensors are traceless.
Differentiate with respect to time. The vacuum Maxwell equations give , so
The curl of the curl identity is . Since ,
The same Maxwell equations give
where the last equality uses . Combining with part (ii),
The divergences of the symmetric gradients satisfy
Thus the local identity is . Integrate over the fixed volume and apply the divergence theorem componentwise:
Here uses the outward normal vector.
The divergence of a cross product identity and the vacuum Maxwell equations imply
The divergence theorem therefore gives the required balance with
An additive time-independent constant in is immaterial. This is the vacuum Poynting theorem in the normalization of the given equations: equivalently . The order of the cross product accounts for the plus sign in the stated integral identity.
Choose generalized coordinates measured from a static equilibrium point, and assume a conservative system with no velocity-dependent forces. Keeping terms of degree two in displacements and velocities gives the small oscillation Lagrangian
Here is the positive-definite symmetric mass matrix evaluated at equilibrium, and is the symmetric Hessian matrix of the potential energy there. The linear potential term is zero by equilibrium, and an additive constant has been dropped. Coordinate-dependent corrections to the kinetic matrix contribute only at higher order.
The Euler-Lagrange equations are . For a normal mode , they give the generalized eigenvalue problem . A nonzero mode shape exists exactly when
This is a degree- polynomial in . At a stable equilibrium its roots are nonnegative; zero roots correspond to zero modes.
Choose positive so the bob is displaced to the right relative to the cart. Its Cartesian coordinates are
Differentiation gives . Thus the exact kinetic energy and potential energy are
Retain quadratic terms, using in the kinetic cross term and in the potential. The Lagrangian is
Its Euler-Lagrange equations give
The kinetic cross term is essential: acceleration of the support couples the pendulum and cart. These equations define the normal modes of a spring-mounted pendulum cart.
With the stated parameters, the mass and restoring matrices are
The generalized eigenvalue problem gives
Therefore the two normal angular frequencies are
The second row of the modal equation is . It gives the mode shapes
Each normal mode has arbitrary small amplitude and phase . The bob's horizontal displacement is to first order. Thus in the lower mode, bob and cart move in phase, with bob amplitude times the cart amplitude. In the higher mode they move oppositely, because ; the bob amplitude is times the cart amplitude. Its vertical displacement is quadratic in the angle and is absent at this order.
Let , which is finite. A group homomorphism preserves powers and the identity, so
If , divide by : with . Then , and minimality of forces . Thus
If is a group isomorphism, apply the same argument to its inverse: . The two inequalities yield
The two products are conjugate:
Conjugation by is a group automorphism, so part (a) proves
Directly, cancellation gives for every positive integer . Thus a power of one product is the identity exactly when the same power of the other is the identity. This proves that conjugation preserves element order, even without the finiteness assumption.
The hypothesis implies for every , including the identity, so . For arbitrary , their product also equals its own inverse. The inverse-of-a-product rule therefore gives
Thus is an abelian group. Finiteness is not needed for this implication; it holds for every group in which each element squares to the identity.
Assume (I). Existence of a decomposition is part of the hypothesis. If are two decompositions, multiply on the left by and on the right by to obtain
The left side belongs to and the right side to , since they are subgroups. Their common value belongs to , so and . This proves uniqueness, hence (II).
Conversely, assume (II). Existence immediately gives . If , then
are two allowed factorizations, because the identity is in each subgroup. Uniqueness makes their first components equal, so . Thus and (I) follows.
Therefore (I) and (II) are equivalent. This is an exact factorization of a group. For finite groups it gives , but it does not by itself identify with a direct product of groups; multiplication between the two factors can be noncommutative.
The two diagonal generators are independent involutions, so
It is a Klein four-group. Write the swapping generator as . Then , so has order two. Moreover,
Thus normalizes . The set
is a group: its products reduce using
and inverses reduce in the same way. It contains both generating subgroups, so minimality gives ; conversely every displayed product is in , giving .
There are four diagonal matrices and four off-diagonal matrices , all distinct. Consequently
Also , since is not diagonal, and every element of has the form . This proves condition (I), hence the exact factorization of a group. Here is a normal subgroup and is a semidirect product. Its matrices are the two-dimensional signed permutation matrices, also realizing the dihedral group of the square.
A vector subspace is an invariant subspace for the group representation if
Because is also in the group and is invertible, the inclusion is equivalently for every .
For , the representation is an irreducible representation when its only invariant vector subspaces are
Thus no nonzero proper subspace is preserved by all representing matrices.
Every is invertible because both inversion and the conjugate transpose preserve invertibility. For , the group homomorphism property of and reversal of multiplication under the adjoint give
Also . Hence is a group representation. It is the inverse-adjoint representation of ; the inverse and adjoint each reverse product order, so together they preserve it.
Use the standard Hermitian inner product . Since is invariant under every , it is in particular invariant under
Let and . Then
because and is orthogonal to . Thus is orthogonal to every , proving
Therefore is an invariant subspace for . If is irreducible, is either or . In finite-dimensional inner product space, , so these alternatives force or . Hence
No unitarity of was assumed; the inverse-adjoint representation is exactly what makes this orthogonal complement argument work.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.