For the real decaying Bessel form used here, take . The original PDF has as the last factor in its auxiliary differential equation, although both differentiated factors have argument ; that last argument must also be for the stated Modified Bessel differential equation.
Put . The corrected identity is . Since the field is radial, the radial Laplacian gives
Away from the point source this must vanish. For , a constant ratio of to would make a pure power, incompatible with the term of its equation. Therefore both displayed coefficients must vanish:
The two orders give the same Modified Bessel function of the second kind: .[ref]
The source describes merely as real, but the following displayed real square-root formula implicitly needs . For the operator with arbitrary real , its decaying fundamental solution instead uses ; is obtained by a limit. The unmodified real ansatz is not a real Bessel formula for all negative .

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.