For an analytic function, the complex differentiability limit is independent of the direction of approach. A real increment gives , whereas an imaginary increment gives
Equality of real and imaginary parts proves the Cauchy-Riemann equations:
Conversely, if have continuous first partial derivatives near a point and obey these equations, their real differentiability gives, for a complex increment ,
Dividing by proves the complex differentiability there. Continuous first partial derivatives are a sufficient regularity hypothesis for this converse; agreement along the two coordinate directions alone is only a necessary condition.
Using the complex cosine identity,
we find
Its real part is exactly the prescribed function. Thus a harmonic conjugate is , and the general answer is
To check the only freedom, two analytic functions with this real part differ by a function with zero real part. The Cauchy-Riemann equations then force both partial derivatives of its imaginary part to vanish, so it is constant on the connected domain. No normalization was supplied to fix .
Multiply the exponential power series by the two prefactors:
Collecting powers yields the Laurent series
Its first terms are . Infinitely many negative-power coefficients are nonzero, so . The residue is the coefficient of :
The phrase "power series" here refers to a Laurent series; no ordinary Taylor series about an essential singularity exists.
The denominator vanishes at , giving two simple poles. Their distances from the center are both . There are no nearer singularities, so the Taylor series has radius of convergence
Apply the Cauchy-Hadamard theorem to the power series coefficients for :
For example, taking logarithms gives . Therefore
Any convention for the isolated coefficient has no effect on the radius of convergence.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.