Several historical models represented the same broad magnetic observations in different ways:
James Clerk Maxwell's later treatment explicitly contrasts the induction model associated with Siméon Denis Poisson with Weber's permanently magnetic molecules and discusses the predicted saturation limit.[ref] Its 1873 date is retained; the chapter is used to explain the earlier hypotheses, not attributed to an 1865 publication.
Experiments constrain these models. Cutting a magnet produces smaller magnets with both poles, rather than simply separating free north and south charges. A current loop and an ordinary magnet also have closely related external dipole fields. Such facts explain the utility of molecular dipoles and currents, but do not uniquely identify the microscopic constituents. Modern magnetic domains, electron spin and quantum magnetic ordering refine the account; classical loops and freely turning isolated molecular magnets are incomplete microscopic pictures of a real ferromagnet. An effective pole calculation must likewise be distinguished from claiming an observed isolated magnetic monopole.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.