Assume NiFe is the softer layer, with , and that interlayer coupling is weak enough to permit separate reversal. Starting at large negative , both magnetizations point in the same direction and . During an increasing-field sweep:
  • At , NiFe reverses while Co does not: the state is antiparallel and the resistance rises to .
  • At , Co also reverses: the state becomes parallel and the resistance returns to .
On decreasing from positive saturation, the high-resistance window instead lies between and . Thus the two sweep directions give displaced rectangular high-resistance windows, not a single reversible resistance peak centered on zero.
Figure 1.
Pseudo spin-valve resistance loops, distributed switching and spacer dilution
. Original illustrative curves. Separate coercive fields create an antiparallel window on each sweep. The middle panel isolates switching-field broadening; its retained peak height is not a claim that real roughness leaves the GMR amplitude unchanged. Source. Details.
If Co were the softer layer, the sequence of layer labels would be exchanged. A continuous spacer and sufficiently weak coupling are additional assumptions: negligible surface roughness alone does not guarantee independent switching at every Cu thickness.

Ancestors (11)

  1. ii
  2. 16
  3. Section A(ii)
  4. Paper 2
  5. 2023
  6. Past exam of the MPhil in micro- and nanotechnology enterprise course of the University of Cambridge
  7. MPhil in micro- and nanotechnology enterprise course of the University of Cambridge
  8. Course of the University of Cambridge
  9. University of Cambridge
  10. List of universities
  11. Home

View article source

Discussion (0)

New discussion

There are no discussions about this article yet.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.
See all articles in the same topic Create my own version