Past exam of the nonlinear Optics and Quantum States of Light course of the University of Cambridge / 2016 / Paper 1 / 2

The optical Kerr effect gives an intensity-dependent refractive index, $n=n_0+n_{2}I$, in the simplest instantaneous isotropic model. A beam whose intensity varies transversely therefore writes a transverse index profile into the medium. Over length $L$ its nonlinear phase is approximately ${\varphi }_{\mathrm{NL}}({\mathbf{r}}_{\perp })=k_0{n}_{2}I({\mathbf{r}}_{\perp })L$, with $k_0=\omega /c$.

For a bright-centered beam, positive $n_2$ raises the index at the center and produces self-focusing; negative $n_2$ produces self-defocusing. The medium acts as an intensity-dependent lens. This is a transverse effect, distinct from temporal self-phase modulation broadening a pulse's spectrum, though both originate in the same nonlinear index. Kerr lenses can provide intensity-dependent mode selection in a laser, and a beam's index profile can guide or deflect a second beam through cross-phase modulation.

The competition with diffraction appears in a paraxial model,In one transverse dimension, focusing can balance diffraction to support a bright spatial optical soliton under suitable boundary conditions. Transverse perturbations can also grow through modulational instability, breaking a broad beam into localized structures. In an ideal two-transverse-dimensional cubic model, sufficiently strong focusing permits collapse; the critical-power scale is proportional to ${\lambda }^2/(n_0{n}_2)$, with its numerical coefficient depending on the convention and profile used.

A real medium does not develop an actual infinite intensity. Saturation, multiphoton absorption, ionization, nonparaxial propagation and damage can arrest or invalidate the simple model. Filament formation therefore requires more physics than inserting a real constant $n_2$ into a lens formula. The useful applications exploit a controllable index profile; the same positive feedback can be a serious limitation on transporting high-power beams.

Quasi-phase-matching compensates phase mismatch by deliberately modulating the nonlinear coefficient, rather than demanding that the material wavevectors themselves exactly match. In a periodically poled ferroelectric crystal, reversing domains changes the sign of the relevant second-order coefficient. Flipping it when the nonlinear interaction would begin to undo previous conversion restores constructive accumulation over many domains.

Write $d(z)={\sum }_m{d}_m{e}^{imKz}$ with $K=2\pi /\Lambda$. The amplitude integral contains phases $e^{i(\Delta k+mK)z}$, so a Fourier component is useful whenFor first-order compensation, $\Lambda =2\pi /|\Delta k|$ and each domain has width $\Lambda /2={\ell }_c$. This is twice the single-domain coherence length for the complete sign pattern, not a full period equal to ${\ell }_c$.

For ideal equal-width domains switching between $+d$ and $-d$, the resonant first Fourier coefficient has magnitude $2d/\pi$. The effective amplitude coefficient is therefore reduced by $2/\pi$, and conversion intensity by $4/{\pi }^2$, relative to a perfectly phase-matched uniform crystal using that same $d$. Nevertheless, quasi-phase matching can permit a larger tensor coefficient or wavelengths and polarizations inaccessible to ordinary birefringent phase matching, more than compensating that idealized reduction.

Periodically poled lithium niobate is a practical example. Such gratings support second-harmonic and sum-frequency generation, difference-frequency conversion, optical parametric oscillation and pair generation. The period and temperature select the operating wavelengths; finite length gives a finite mismatch acceptance. Domain duty-cycle errors, nonuniform temperature, absorption and finite spatial or temporal overlap limit the result. Chirped or apodized patterns can reshape bandwidth, but do not make these physical limits disappear.

An atom-field dressed state is an eigenstate of the coupled atom and drive, rather than an eigenstate of the isolated atom. A strong near-resonant field mixes the bare two-level states and changes the transition spectrum. In a frame rotating at the drive frequency, the rotating-wave approximation gives, for one convenient convention,Here $\Omega$ is the resonant Rabi frequency. The two eigenvalues areAt resonance, the dressed states are equal-weight symmetric and antisymmetric combinations of the bare atom–field configurations. For a quantized drive, the appropriate paired configurations are $|e,n⟩$ and $|g,n+1⟩$; their coupling scales as $\sqrt{n+1}$. A strong coherent drive gives the familiar approximately classical Rabi frequency over its occupied photon-number range.

Radiative transitions connect neighboring dressed manifolds. Same-branch transitions have frequency near ${\omega }_L$, while opposite-branch transitions give sidebands near ${\omega }_L\pm {\Omega }_R$. Under sufficiently strong resonant driving this produces the Mollow triplet in resonance fluorescence, with sidebands separated from the center by $\Omega$. Radiation damping determines widths and weights; detuning changes the relative intensities. Sidebands must be sufficiently separated compared with the decay scale to be resolved.^[ref]

A fluorescence experiment drives the transition with a narrow-band laser, collects scattered light away from the intense drive beam, and resolves its spectrum. Changing drive intensity changes $\Omega$ and hence the splitting. This measures transitions of the interacting system, not merely a population oscillation in time. The emitted spectrum can include an elastic coherent contribution as well as the inelastic fluorescence peaks, so the observed line shape needs the specified drive, damping and detection model.