Take . Every open disk contains infinitely many points with both coordinates rational, so every point of the plane is an accumulation point of . Every disk also contains infinitely many points with an irrational first coordinate, and these lie in the complement. Thus
The infinitely-many-points observation ensures that one can avoid the centre of the disk itself in both cases.
Take
Its only accumulation point is , which is absent from . Every listed point is isolated, so none belongs to . Consequently
For completeness, away from the origin a sufficiently small disk meets only finitely many of the listed points and can be shrunk to exclude all but its centre, proving there are no further accumulation points.
Use three nested sequences:
For fixed , letting produces the point . Letting produces , and letting produces . Accordingly, put
The successive derived sets are
To see that no limits are missing, take any convergent sequence of distinct points from . If is unbounded, a subsequence has and converges to the origin. Otherwise fix on a subsequence. Unbounded then forces limit ; with fixed, distinctness forces unbounded , giving the corresponding point of . The same argument, with one index fewer at each stage, proves the next two equalities. Distinct -clusters are separated away from the origin because their first coordinates lie in the disjoint intervals .
The original set has positive second coordinates, the first derived set has isolated -points on the axis, the second has infinitely many -points, and the third is a singleton. All three required successive inequalities follow. This is a three-stage accumulation tower.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.