For actual complete bounce distances and , the geometric series givesA natural intended estimate compares the observed first round trip with the loss-free round trip from the initially compressed position,If the reduction factor is taken to be , the answer is . The first term is the actual 4 m, not the hypothetical loss-free distance.
This numerical inference needs the stated comparison assumption. Strictly, knowing the first actual bounce distance and saying subsequent distances share a ratio does not independently specify that ratio. A change in spring compression also means that an energy-loss fraction is not automatically the same as a vertical-distance ratio.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.