A mixed strategy for Player II is a probability vector , with and . The player chooses pure strategy with probability , independently of the opponent's randomization.
Against , choosing row gives Player I expected payoff . The best response maximizes this number; randomizing among rows cannot exceed the largest row payoff. Player II therefore minimizes that maximum, exactly the printed optimization problem.
The minimax theorem for a finite zero-sum game statesThis common number is the value of a zero-sum game: Player I can guarantee an expected payoff of at least , and Player II can hold it to at most . At optimal mixed strategies their expected transfer is .
Player I can choose each row with probability . Against column the expected payoff is . Nonnegativity and a strictly positive entry in each column make every one of these finitely many numbers strictly positive. Their minimumis therefore a guaranteed payoff against every mixture of columns. By the minimax theorem, .
For the minimizing player, column one weakly dominates column three, since its payoff is no greater in every row. We may therefore choose an optimum with . Write , . The three row payoffs are , , and .
The maximum of the decreasing line and the increasing line is minimized where they meet: , with value . At this point the first line is only , so it does not increase the maximum. Hence the candidate isA dual certificate establishes optimality against every possible three-column mixture. Player I's strategy gives column payoffs , guaranteeing at least . The displayed holds every row payoff to at most . These matching guarantees prove the claimed value and optimality.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.