Source correction: equation 11 on the original page has . The dimensionally regulated integral instead contains . This is not an interchangeable convention: for and , the correct factor has a logarithmic ultraviolet pole, whereas the printed is finite.
To obtain the correct expression, shift the loop momentum and perform a Wick rotation. For positive Euclidean , introduce a Schwinger parameterization:
The derivation first holds in the convergent range and defines the result elsewhere by analytic continuation. For integer , rotating back gives
with the branch inherited from . This is the Lorentzian continuation of the Euclidean massive loop integral.
Set , , . Since ,
Consequently the directed tadpole in part d gives
The counterterm is , so cancelling only the pole in the minimal subtraction scheme requires
This is the quartic complex-scalar mass renormalization result. The scale factors and logarithms contribute finite terms at this order and do not change the displayed pole coefficient. A real-field check gives a tadpole coefficient , in agreement with the oriented complex-field computation.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.