Label the incoming four-momenta and the outgoing ones . Define the Mandelstam variables , , . Two incoming particles have conserved charge , so the only tree-level Feynman diagram is an -channel exchange, shown in panel (b) of b's figure. Each end converts two charge-one lines into one charge-two line. There are no - or -channel exchanges: an incoming and an outgoing particle at such an end would transfer zero charge, for which this theory has no cubic interaction vertex.The single Feynman diagram is already symmetric under exchanging the two outgoing particles. This does not add another copy of the scattering amplitude; the identical final-state symmetry factor enters the integrated scattering cross-section instead.
Take with the Mandelstam variables of i. The allowed tree-level Feynman diagram is the crossed -channel exchange in panel (c) of b's figure. At one end the incoming particle and outgoing antiparticle transfer charge ; the other end absorbs that charge. The zero-charge - and -channel assignments are forbidden by the interaction vertices. ThusIn the center-of-mass frame with , and . For , both scattering amplitudes approach . The elastic two-body Lorentz-invariant phase space and incident flux agree for the two experiments. Usingfor distinguishable final particles, and an extra factor when integrating the identical-particle final state over the whole sphere, givesThere is no additional division for identical incoming particles in the definition of a beam scattering cross-section. Before taking , the zero-momentum ratio is , provided the threshold is away from the heavy pole.
Near , the bare -channel scalar propagator makes fixed-order perturbation theory fail: repeated self-energy insertions contain powers of . The channel is open for , giving the leading decay widthResumming the self-energy gives a finite Breit-Wigner resonance cross section, with denominator near the pole, rather than an infinite scattering cross-section. Also, with lies outside the assumed nonrelativistic incoming kinematics; the ratio is not a resonance prediction.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.