The new light active leptons open one additional channel and two channels. At the stated equal-partial-width approximation,The quoted MeV is the total invisible width into the three known neutrino flavors, not the width into one flavor. The invisible Z width per active neutrino fixes this interpretation. The notation in the numerical input is ambiguous; the Standard Model normalization fixes the new active-neutrino contribution to MeV. Adding the new charged-lepton width therefore givesThis interpretation is consistent with the usual determination of the effective number of active neutrinos from the invisible width divided by the predicted width of a single species.[ref]
Number of Neutrino Types by Particle Data Group. definition of the effective neutrino count from the total invisible width and the single-species neutrino width
Keep the original light-fermion production and observed-decay partial decay widths, masses and prefactors fixed. New leptonic channels alter their branching fractions through the total widths. From the peak formula in d,Consequently,The relatively small change is a cancellation between the increase in the two total widths; each separately changes substantially more. This assumes that the new quarks do not contribute and that adding leptons leaves the old partial decay widths unchanged.
If the source's MeV were instead imposed literally as the width of a single neutrino flavor, the algebra would give MeV and . That would be a different numerical premise, inconsistent with the Standard Model interpretation of the supplied invisible-width value. It is recorded to make the normalization issue explicit, rather than silently treating the three-flavor sum as a one-flavor partial decay width.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.