A subset is compact if every open cover has a finite subcover. Explicitly, if are open sets of and , there are finitely many indices such that
Equivalently, the subspace topology makes a compact space. An open set in this subspace topology is for an ambient open set , which proves equivalence of the two open cover formulations. The empty set is compact: the empty selection is a finite subcover.
Assume is compact, and let the closed subsets of have the finite intersection property. If their total intersection were empty, their complements would form an open cover of . A finite subcover would give
contradicting the finite intersection property. Therefore the total intersection is nonempty.
Conversely, assume the stated nonempty-intersection property for every family of closed subsets of . Given an open cover of in its subspace topology, set . Their total intersection is empty. By the contrapositive of the assumed property, this family fails the finite intersection property; hence some finite satisfies
This is a finite subcover, proving compactness. Both directions are instances of De Morgan's laws. Thus compactness is equivalent to the finite intersection characterization of compactness.
For completeness, the intersection of the empty family of subsets of is . If is empty, no family has the finite intersection property when the empty finite subfamily is included, so the implication remains valid.
Let be a closed subset of the compact space . Express an arbitrary open cover of in its subspace topology as , where the are open sets of . Since is open, the family
is an open cover of . Take a finite subcover and discard if it occurs. The remaining finitely many still cover , since the discarded set contains no point of . Their traces on give the required finite subcover. Hence every closed subset of a compact space is compact, with no Hausdorff assumption.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.