The function composition of two bijections is a bijection. Its inverse function is two-sided, so
This is exactly the defining cancellation property of an inverse function, with the whole function composition regarded as one function.
The inverse factors are generally in the wrong order. For a counterexample, take the bijections and , with inverse functions and . Then
Thus
For particular bijections that commute the equality can hold; the claim fails as a universal assertion.
Use the associativity of function composition to cancel adjacent inverse functions in the right order:
Therefore
For the bijections and used above, sends to . Its inverse function sends to , whereas sends to . Hence
The proposed inverse function cancels on both sides:
The uniqueness of an inverse function therefore gives
The operation applied last must be undone first.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.