First derive by double-negation elimination, then derive by negation introduction. The logical falsity elimination rule is used only inside the attempt to derive .
1  ¬(A → B)  premise
 2  | ¬A     assumption
 3  | | A    assumption
 4  | | ⊥    ¬-elim 3,2
 5  | | B    ⊥-elim 4
 6  | A → B  →-intro 3–5
 7  | ⊥      ¬-elim 6,1
 8  ¬¬A      ¬-intro 2–7
 9  A        ¬¬-elim 8
10  | B      assumption
11  | | A    assumption
12  | | B    reiteration 10
13  | A → B  →-intro 11–12
14  | ⊥      ¬-elim 13,1
15  ¬B       ¬-intro 10–14
16  A ∧ ¬B   ∧-intro 9,15
Reiteration at line 12 merely uses an assumption that remains in scope. The final follows by conjunction introduction. This explicitly supplies the classical step needed to obtain rather than just .

Ancestors (13)

  1. ii
  2. d
  3. 7
  4. Digital systems, linear algebra, introduction to formal proof
  5. 2016
  6. Past exam of the year 1 of the computer science course of the University of Oxford
  7. Year 1 of the computer science course of the University of Oxford
  8. Computer science course of the University of Oxford
  9. Undergraduate course of the University of Oxford
  10. Course of the University of Oxford
  11. University of Oxford
  12. List of universities
  13. Home

View article source

Discussion (0) New discussion

There are no discussions about this article yet.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.
See all articles in the same topic Create my own version