We prove both set inclusions, as required by a double inclusion proof. If , then and . Thus and , so and . This proves the forward set inclusion.
Conversely, if , then , , and . Hence , giving . Therefore
For the first set inclusion, take . Membership in the intersection gives and , while the set difference gives . Consequently .
For the reverse set inclusion, an element of belongs to both and and does not belong to . It therefore belongs to . By double inclusion proof,
Complements are relative to the same universal set . Suppose and . Then and . If belonged to , the assumed set inclusion would imply , a contradiction. Thus and , proving
There is only one set inclusion in this conclusion; a reverse inclusion is neither needed nor generally true. The request for double inclusion applies to the equalities in (i) and (ii).

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.