First . If a nonnegative random variable had zero expected value, it would equal zero almost surely, which is impossible for a distribution having a probability density function on : a singleton has probability zero. Thus the given division by is legitimate.
Because and , . MoreoverExtend by zero for negative . It is a probability density function, defining the size-biased distribution of : larger observations receive weight proportional to their value.
The law of the unconscious statistician and the finite variance giveThus size bias increases the mean by , in accord with preferentially selecting larger values.
Write and . For , the factor is at most one throughout , soFor , compare the tails instead: throughout , givingRearranging provesThis is stochastic domination of by its size-biased distribution. The proof needs only the finite positive mean, not the finite variance assumed in (ii).
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.