First . If a nonnegative random variable had zero expected value, it would equal zero almost surely, which is impossible for a distribution having a probability density function on : a singleton has probability zero. Thus the given division by is legitimate.
Because and , . Moreover
Extend by zero for negative . It is a probability density function, defining the size-biased distribution of : larger observations receive weight proportional to their value.
The law of the unconscious statistician and the finite variance give
Thus size bias increases the mean by , in accord with preferentially selecting larger values.
Write and . For , the factor is at most one throughout , so
For , compare the tails instead: throughout , giving
Rearranging proves
This is stochastic domination of by its size-biased distribution. The proof needs only the finite positive mean, not the finite variance assumed in (ii).

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.