False. For , every factor from through is at least , so
No fixed multiple of eventually bounds the factorial, contradicting the definition of Big O notation. No use of Stirling's approximation is required.
True. For every , , and raising both nonnegative sides to the th power gives
Thus the Big O notation condition holds with constant and threshold .
False. It suffices to find a subsequence along which the ratio is unbounded. Set . The last factors of are at least , while the first factors have product at least one. Hence
This contradicts the eventual uniform bound required by Big O notation. The proof is an elementary factorial comparison, independent of Stirling's approximation.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.