Let be the determinant of the leading principal submatrix. Expansion along the last row gives an term and a term with negative cofactor sign. In the latter minor, the final column has only nonzero, and deleting that row and column leaves the leading principal submatrix. Thus the tridiagonal determinant recurrence is
Here is the empty determinant convention, needed to include . The derivation uses cofactor expansion, so the recurrence relation remains valid when coefficients or intermediate determinants vanish; it never divides by a pivot element.
Evaluate the recurrence relation successively, retaining only the preceding two values. Each of the updates uses three multiplications and one subtraction. Hence arithmetic operations and auxiliary storage suffice, excluding the stored input. Naively branching into two recursive calls would repeat work; the sequential computation is essential. This is an arithmetic-operation bound, not a bit-complexity bound for arbitrarily large exact integers.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.