Choose using target depth, scale, expected contrasts, overburden, noise and required result. A seismic reflection survey uses reflected travel times and amplitudes to image interfaces; it needs useful acoustic impedance contrasts, sufficient bandwidth, suitable offsets and dense coverage for moveout correction, stacking and seismic migration. A large clay-cap/igneous contrast gives a potentially strong reflection here, but fractures, scattering and attenuation can obscure coherent events. At Hz the nominal quarter-wavelength vertical seismic resolution is about m in the claystone and m in the igneous rock, if that frequency reaches the target.
A seismic refraction survey uses first arrivals and critically refracted waves to estimate velocities and interface structure. The increase from to is favorable for a cap-base head-wave branch, provided the spread reaches sufficient offsets. Refraction/tomography may better constrain lateral velocity variations and fractures, but simple head-wave inversion can miss a low-velocity layer or a thin hidden layer and often has poorer boundary detail.
Use expected reflector continuity, velocity inversions, required aperture, access, near-surface complexity and cost to choose or combine the surveys. A pilot gather and travel-time modelling can test which phases will be measurable; the supplied velocities alone do not specify the reservoir depth or the best acquisition geometry.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.