Biproduct-induced addition of morphisms 2026-10-05
In a pointed category with finite product in a category and coproducts in a category and invertible canonical maps , the unique commutative-monoid enrichment is . Associativity and commutativity follow by comparing fold maps on triple and swapped coproduct injections. Composition distributes by the universal properties. For uniqueness, bilinearity forces on each biproduct, and composing with the fold and the paired morphism forces the addition formula.
Category of pointed sets Created 2026-10-05 Updated 2026-10-14
The category of pointed sets and basepoint-preserving functions is a pointed category. It is equivalent to the category of partial functions by adjoining or deleting the basepoint. It is not isomorphic to the category of all actual sets and partial functions: there are many distinct singleton zero objects, whereas the empty set is the sole zero object in that category.
Cokernel invariance under pushout 2026-10-06
In a pointed category, a pushout in a category of and induces an isomorphism between their categorical cokernels, when those cokernels exist. Push out the cokernel map of together with the zero map, then factor through the cokernel of . Cokernel and pushout uniqueness prove that this map is inverse to the induced comparison. No abelian hypothesis is needed.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 25 8 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
Take any morphism and let be its categorical cokernel. Let be the categorical kernel of . Since , kernel universality gives with . The map is a monomorphism. We must establish the pseudo-epimorphism property of , rather than merely name an image.
Suppose satisfies . Let be its categorical kernel. Then for some . The composite is a monomorphism, so the hypothesis that every monomorphism is normal provides a map of which is a categorical kernel, up to its unique compatible isomorphism. Now . The categorical cokernel property of gives , and therefore .
Since is the categorical kernel of , the map factors through it: for some . Cancel the monomorphism to get . As is also a monomorphism, , so is an isomorphism. Finally , proving that is a pseudo-epimorphism.
ThusThe pseudo-epimorphism factorization through the kernel of a cokernel proof uses a pointed category, existence of categorical kernels and categorical cokernels, and normality of every monic map. It does not silently replace pseudo-epic cancellation against zero by the stronger epimorphism condition.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2014 iii Paper 18 8 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
In a pointed category, a zero object defines zero morphisms between all objects. A categorical cokernel of is a map with such that every with factors uniquely as . Equivalently it is the coequalizer of and the zero map, so is an epimorphism.
Write , , and for the vertical arrows, with and . The left pushout in a category applied to the compatible pair and gives satisfying and . The categorical cokernel property of then gives with .
Now . Cancel the epimorphism to obtain . To prove the other identity, the two arrows agree after , because , and after , because both composites are zero. The pushout in a category uniqueness clause gives . Cancelling the epimorphism gives .
Thus is an isomorphism: cokernel invariance under pushout holds already in pointed categories with the indicated cokernels.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 119 6 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
A pointed category has a zero object, both initial and terminal. Factoring through that object gives a zero morphism between any two objects. In this paper a semi-additive structure means commutative-monoid enrichment: every hom-set is a commutative monoid with additive zero, and composition distributes over addition in both variables. No existence of finite products in a category is included in this last definition. This convention matters for the final one-object example; under the stronger convention requiring finite biproducts, that example would not be a semi-additive category.
Let be the given canonical isomorphism. Transfer the coproduct injections across , so is also a coproduct in a category, with injectionsWrite for the morphism whose composites with are both . For , define the biproduct-induced addition of morphisms byThe zero is the existing zero morphism. We verify the laws from the universal properties, without assuming addition in advance.
All finite canonical maps from coproducts to products are isomorphisms, by induction from the binary ones and the zero object. Thus both and are ternary coproducts in a category. The two iterated fold maps to agree on each of the three injections, hence are equal. Applying this to gives associativity. The interchange swaps the two injections, so its composite with is , giving commutativity. Finally , so , and similarly .
Precomposition is additive because . For , the morphisms and agree on both injections, so they agree; consequently . Composition with a zero morphism is zero. This proves the commutative-monoid enrichment.
It is unique. In any such enrichment, the additive zero morphisms agree with the pointed ones, since each map to or from the zero object belongs to a singleton hom-set. The projections of from are respectively by bilinearity, soFor , composing on the left by and on the right by forces the displayed formula for . Thus the biproducts determine exactly one such enrichment.
For the last part, the underlying one-object category has endomorphism monoid , including , and identity . Its usual addition gives a commutative-monoid enrichment. Any permutation of the prime numbers extends, by unique prime factorization, to a multiplicative monoid automorphism , fixing . Transport addition byThis is a commutative monoid operation with zero , and multiplication distributes over it: applying reduces each distributive law to the ordinary one in . Thus each operation supplies a semi-additive structure on the same fixed composition law.
For each odd prime , take to interchange and , fixing every other prime. ThenDifferent choices of give different additions, and there are infinitely many prime numbers. Hence there are infinitely many distinct semi-additive structures, even though these transported structures are isomorphic as enriched categories. The underlying one-object category has no terminal object, because its endomorphism set is not a singleton, so it indeed has no finite products in a category.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2021 iii Paper 119 6 Solution 2026-09-28
In a pointed category, a normal monomorphism is a monomorphism that is the kernel in a category of some morphism. Suppose is the kernel of , and let be the cokernel in a category of . Since , there is a unique with . If , then , so the universal property of factors uniquely through . Therefore . The converse is immediate: if is the kernel of its cokernel, it is the kernel of a morphism and hence normal.
An abelian category is an additive category with kernels and cokernels in which every monomorphism is normal and every epimorphism is a conormal epimorphism. Finite biproducts and kernels give finite limits. The image and coimage in an abelian category give every the canonical factorizationand the middle map is an isomorphism. The first map is a cokernel and therefore a regular epimorphism. Every epimorphism in an abelian category is the cokernel of its kernel, and epimorphisms are stable under pullback; consequently regular epimorphisms are pullback-stable. This proves that every abelian category is regular.
Define the additive indexing category for chain complexes as follows. Its objects are the integers andLet the generator of be and the generator of be . Composition is bilinear, the are identities, andbecause the target hom-group is zero. An additive functor chooses objects and differentials satisfying , hence a complex in an abelian category. Conversely every chain complex defines this unique additive functor.
For self-duality, put , , and let . Since , there is a unique with . The image-to-kernel factorization gives a canonical isomorphismPassing to the opposite category exchanges kernels with cokernels and images with coimages. The usual construction in is therefore the expression on the right, which is canonically the original homology object. This proves the self-duality of homology.
Pseudo-epimorphism 2026-10-07
A morphism in a pointed category is pseudo-epic when, for every , the equation forces . If a categorical cokernel exists, this is equivalent to that cokernel having a zero object as codomain. Indeed all zero composites then factor uniquely through zero; conversely the cokernel itself must be zero, and being both zero and epic forces its codomain to have identity zero, hence be a zero object. Every epimorphism is pseudo-epic. In a preadditive category, subtraction shows the converse: implies , hence . In a general pointed category no subtraction is available.
In a pointed category with categorical kernels and categorical cokernels, where every monomorphism is normal, every factors through as , with a pseudo-epimorphism. If , write . Then factors through , and the monic is a categorical kernel of some by normality. Since , the cokernel of forces . Hence factors through , forcing to be an isomorphism and therefore . This establishes the factorization without assuming the stronger abelian category axioms.
Zero morphism 2026-10-05
In a pointed category, the zero morphism is the composite through its zero object. Composition on either side by any morphism remains zero. In a commutative-monoid enrichment on a pointed category, the additive zero must coincide with this zero morphism: morphisms to and from the zero object belong to singleton hom-sets.