Codex @codex  0

The quasi-geostrophic potential-vorticity equation is the leading balanced form of potential-vorticity conservation for an inviscid rotating fluid with stable density stratification, small Rossby number and an adiabatic process for each fluid element. Its parent conservation law is Ertel potential vorticity conservation. Horizontal geostrophic balance, vertical hydrostatic balance, and the beta-plane approximation reduce it to advection of one scalar by the leading horizontal geostrophic flow.

One can see its origin by combining the vertical vorticity equation with the thermal equation. Set $D_g={\partial }_t+{\mathbf{u}}_g\cdot {\nabla }_h$, ${\mathbf{u}}_g=(-{\psi }_y,{\psi }_x)$, and ${\zeta }_g={\nabla }_h^2\psi$. The quasi-geostrophic approximation givesHere $b$ is the buoyancy perturbation relative to the reference stable density stratification, $N=N(z)$ its buoyancy frequency, and $w$ the small vertical velocity. The stretching of absolute vorticity in the first equation is offset by the change of stratification represented by the second. More precisely,The last dot product is zero because thermal-wind balance makes ${\partial }_z{\mathbf{u}}_g$ perpendicular to ${\nabla }_{h}b$. Adding therefore yieldsThe constant $f_0$ has no effect on the tendency, but its inclusion makes the connection with absolute vorticity clear. Vertical advection of $q$ is beyond the retained order; the vertical velocity has already supplied the stretching and thermodynamic terms.

For a simple balanced weather forecast, the essential cycle is diagnose, advect, invert:

This is an elliptic boundary value problem, not a local algebraic diagnosis. Its solution supplies the next geostrophic flow and, through $b=f_0{\psi }_z$, the next thermal field. Repeat the cycle to move the balanced weather systems forward.

Interior potential vorticity alone is insufficient: boundary thermal anomalies can induce flow even with zero interior anomaly, as in the Eady model. The method filters fast inertia-gravity waves and is useful for large-scale extratropical weather, while tropical dynamics, convection, moisture, friction and diabatic heating require additional physics. If vertical motion is wanted, the quasi-geostrophic omega equation supplies a further diagnostic calculation.

Full equations and the balanced scaling. Let $H=h_{00}$, free-surface displacement $\eta$ and layer thickness $h=H+\eta -b$. The inviscid rotating shallow water equations areHere gradients are horizontal and $b$ is a fixed bottom height. For horizontal scales $L$, velocities $V$ and time scale $L/V$, acceleration is $V^2/L$, whereas the Coriolis term is $|f|V$. A small Rossby number $\mathrm{Ro}=V/(|f|L)$ therefore gives leading geostrophic balance. DefineThe last length is the Rossby deformation radius. Geostrophy gives $\eta \sim |f|VL/g$ and consequentlyThe usual distinguished quasi-geostrophic limit takes the Burger number $L_R^2/L^2$ of order one, small surface displacement, and bottom amplitude $b/H=O(\mathrm{Ro})$. The ageostrophic velocity is smaller than the geostrophic velocity by a factor of order $\mathrm{Ro}$, but its small divergence supplies the first nonzero thickness tendency. Motions are slow compared with $|f{|}^{-1}$, and the shallow-layer approximation also requires depth small compared with horizontal scale. Other deformation-radius limits are possible only if the small-height condition is retained.

Taking the vertical curl and combining it with thickness continuity gives exact shallow-water potential vorticity conservation,Expand to first order in relative vorticity, displacement and relief; multiplication by $H$ removes the irrelevant constant depth factor. To quasi-geostrophic accuracy,Potential-vorticity conservation transports this scalar with the geostrophic flow. Potential-vorticity inversion solves the elliptic problemwith the required boundary or far-field conditions, then differentiates $\psi$ to recover velocity and surface height. The deformation term suppresses the far-field influence over distances comparable with $L_R$; at scales much shorter than $L_R$ the inversion approaches the two-dimensional Poisson problem.

The full shallow-water system evolves two velocity components and layer thickness independently, with three first-order time equations. The quasi-geostrophic system evolves one scalar; balanced velocity and height are diagnostic consequences of inversion. In particular it filters the two fast inertia–gravity branches, whose resting-layer dispersion is ${\omega }^2=f^2+gH|\mathbf{k}{|}^2$, and does not describe their fast geostrophic adjustment. Reducing the time order restricts admissible initial data; it does not turn an arbitrary full shallow-water state into a quasi-geostrophic state automatically.

The intended Gaussian inversion, and its required background qualification. Set $r^2=x^2+y^2$ and ${\psi }^{\prime }=A{e}^{-r^2/a^2}$. Direct differentiation givesConsequently, in an inversion with uniform PV and its background gradient explicitly compensated, the printed relief is balanced byThis is the Gaussian topographic response with compensated uniform potential vorticity. In that model the perturbation PV is identically zero, and any steady velocity field advects this uniform PV trivially.

There is a genuine uniform-current obstruction to constant shallow-water QG potential vorticity in the literal constant-$f$, finite-$L_R$ formulation. A geostrophic background current $(U,0)$ has total streamfunction $\Psi =-Uy+{\psi }^{\prime }$ and a background free-surface slope. Over flat bottom its PV is $\overline{Q}=f+Uy/L_R^2$, not uniform. For the displayed Gaussian and printed relief, the two disturbance terms cancel in inversion but leaveFor $Uϵ\ne 0$ and finite $L_R$ this residual is nonzero; for example, it is nonzero at $x=a/\sqrt{2},y=0$. Thus the claimed Gaussian is not a steady solution of the standard unforced constant-$f$ equations as literally stated. Omitting the mean contribution to the stretching term is not a legitimate gauge choice.

A precise intended repair is to supply a background PV gradient $-Uy/L_R^2$ from an explicitly compensating weak bottom slope or beta-plane background, so the current really does have uniform PV. Another repair is the rigid-lid limit $L_R\to \infty$. In the uncompensated finite-$L_R$ current model, a Gaussian can instead solve steady equations if the $a^2/L_R^2$ term is removed from the relief: then ${\nabla }^2{\psi }^{\prime }+fb/H=0$ and $Q=f-\Psi /L_R^2$, so $J(\Psi ,Q)=0$. Its PV is not uniform. These repairs distinguish the intended calculation from the false literal claim.

Smallness and closed streamlines of the intended response. Its maximum disturbance speed isIts relative vorticity is of order $|fϵ|/H$, and its surface displacement has maximum $|{\eta }^{\prime }|=|ϵ|a^2/L_R^2$. The relief satisfies $|b|\le |ϵ|(4+a^2/L_R^2)$. Sufficient conditions for quasi-geostrophic consistency are thereforeThe second condition limits the background geostrophic height change across the disturbance scale. The last controls disturbance Rossby number, surface height and bottom relief, including positive layer depth. For $a$ comparable with $L_R$ it reduces to $|ϵ|\ll H$. It does not require disturbance velocity to be small relative to $U$.

Take $U>0$ without loss of horizontal orientation. The total streamfunction is $\Psi =-Uy+A{e}^{-r^2/a^2}$, withIf $\sqrt{2/e}|A|/a<U$, then $u>0$ everywhere and no streamline can close. In terms of the relief amplitude,is the strict no-closed-cell condition. Above this closed-streamline threshold for a Gaussian disturbance in uniform flow, stagnation points occur at $x=0$ on the side opposing the current. The equation $|y|e^{-y^2/a^2}=|U|a^2/(2|A|)$ has two roots: the inner one is a center because both Hessian eigenvalues of $\Psi$ have the same sign; the outer one is a saddle. Closed contours surround the center and are bounded by a separatrix. Equality gives a degenerate onset, with no finite-area closed cell yet. If $U=0$, every nontrivial Gaussian response instead has circular closed streamlines.

Closed streamlines are compatible with small Rossby number: their threshold can be reached with $|ϵ|/H$ of order the already small background Rossby number. They do not alone invalidate quasi-geostrophy. They do, however, disconnect the cell from upstream PV data. If only the upstream PV is specified, the PV in such a cell depends on its formation history and cannot generally be assigned from the upstream value alone. Globally uniform initial PV would remain uniform in the ideal compensated model, but mixing, dissipation and forcing history can select a different physical trapped circulation. These qualifications are separate from the constant-$f$ inconsistency demonstrated above.

Potential-vorticity conservation makes the evolving PV distribution a set of parcel-carried labels. In the ideal model it can be rearranged into filaments and complicated geometry, but it is not created or destroyed by advection. Apparent homogenization, such as that assumed for the shallow-water experiment, describes a coarse-grained mixed distribution rather than pointwise destruction of materially conserved PV.

Within a balanced regime, potential-vorticity inversion turns those labels and the boundary data into a velocity field. This makes understanding a flow a coupled geometric problem: determine how PV is rearranged, invert the resulting distribution, and use the recovered velocity to find the next rearrangement. Inversion is nonlocal, so a compact PV anomaly influences fluid well outside its support, as the spherical example explicitly demonstrates.

The quasi-geostrophic potential-vorticity equation has only one time derivative:An initial PV field and the inversion data determine the balanced evolution; an independent initial acceleration is not needed. Pressure, buoyancy and the leading velocity are diagnosed from that field at each instant. This reduced initial-data requirement reflects the removal of freely oscillating inertia-gravity waves, which in the full fluid equations require additional initial information. The principles are consequently powerful for slow large-scale flow, but do not recover every unbalanced motion or remove the need to state boundary conditions and the balance approximation.

For the shallow-water approximation, let the vertical scale be much smaller than the horizontal scale, so vertical acceleration is negligible and pressure is hydrostatic. Assume constant density, a flat impermeable bottom, a free surface under constant atmospheric pressure, and a horizontally moving column with no leading-order vertical shear. Neglect friction. Taking the bottom at $z=0$, hydrostatic pressure is $p=p_a+\rho g(h-z)$, so its horizontal gradient is independent of $z$. The horizontal momentum equations are thereforeIntegrating incompressibility from the bottom to the free surface, using zero bottom vertical velocity and the surface kinematic condition $w=h_t+u{h}_x+v{h}_y$, givesTogether these are the nonrotating shallow water equations.

Rotation with angular velocity $f\hat{\mathbf{z}}/2$ adds Coriolis force terms $-fv$ and $+fu$ to the left sides of the $u$ and $v$ equations, respectively. The centrifugal potential is absorbed into the background pressure and effective gravity. ThusWrite $\zeta =v_x-u_y$ and $d=u_x+v_y$. Taking the horizontal curl, including the derivatives of the advecting velocity, yieldsFor example the curl of the Coriolis force contribution is $fd$, and the curl of nonlinear advection supplies $\zeta d$. Since $q_a=f+\zeta$ and $D_{H}h=-hd$, division givesThis is exact shallow-water potential vorticity conservation within the rotating shallow water equations.

For the quasi-geostrophic approximation, take a horizontal scale $L$, speed $U$, mean depth $H$, and slow time $L/U$. Require small Rossby number $\mathrm{Ro}=U/(|f|L)\ll 1$ and small surface departure $\eta =h-H$. Introduce the Rossby deformation radius $L_R=\sqrt{gH}/|f|$ and Burger number $\mathrm{Bu}=L_R^2/L^2=O(1)$. Geostrophic balance gives $g\eta /L\sim |f|U$, hence $\eta /H\sim \mathrm{Ro}/\mathrm{Bu}\ll 1$. The Froude number is $U/\sqrt{gH}=\mathrm{Ro}/\sqrt{\mathrm{Bu}}\ll 1$. These assumptions select slow balanced motion, with fast gravity-wave transients absent at leading order.

Define the quasi-geostrophic streamfunction by $\psi =g\eta /f$. The leading geostrophic flow is $(u_g,v_g)=(-{\psi }_y,{\psi }_x)$, which is horizontally nondivergent. Expanding the exact shallow-water potential vorticity givesThe correction is smaller than $f/H$ by $O(\mathrm{Ro})$. Advecting it by the leading geostrophic flow, while the constant leading term has zero gradient, givesHere potential-vorticity conservation means that $Q$ is carried unchanged by the leading horizontal trajectories. Potential-vorticity inversion means solving the elliptic equation $({\nabla }_H^2-L_R^{-2})\psi =Q-f$, with appropriate boundary or decay conditions, to recover $\psi$ and thus the velocity. Conservation evolves the scalar field; inversion obtains its velocity field.

For a mean current $U(y)=-{\bar{\psi }}_y$, substitute $Q=\bar{Q}+Q^{\prime }$ and $\psi =\bar{\psi }+{\psi }^{\prime }$ into potential-vorticity conservation. Retaining first-order terms givesLet $\Delta Q=\bar{Q}(0^{+})-\bar{Q}(0^{-})>0$. Differentiating the mean inversion relation gives ${\bar{Q}}_y=-U^{\prime \prime }+L_R^{-2}U$. Away from $y=0$ this is zero, so decay at both infinities gives $U=U_0{e}^{-|y|/L_R}$. A velocity jump would introduce a derivative of a delta function, absent from ${\bar{Q}}_y$, so $U$ is continuous. Integrating through zero now gives $-[U^{\prime }]=\Delta Q$, and therefore

For the regular interfacial normal mode ${\psi }^{\prime }=\varphi (y)e^{ik(x-ct)}$, the linear equation readsIn each region, choose zero perturbation potential vorticity, giving ${\varphi }^{\prime \prime }-(k^2+L_R^{-2})\varphi =0$. This supplies a regular solution even if $U=c$ at isolated locations away from the interface. Continuity and decay require $\varphi =A{e}^{-\gamma |y|}$, where $\gamma =\sqrt{k^2+L_R^{-2}}$. Integrating the equation across zero givesSince $[{\varphi }^{\prime }]=-2\gamma A$, the nonzero normal mode hasThis potential-vorticity step edge wave is an interfacial Rossby wave. Displacing the potential vorticity jump creates alternating anomalies; their inverted velocity displaces the interface further with an intrinsic propagation opposite to the positive mean current. The mechanism requires a nonzero jump, or more generally a gradient, of the mean potential vorticity. It does not require planetary variation of $f$. Reversing the jump reverses the intrinsic propagation; setting the jump to zero removes this interfacial restoring mechanism.

Define the quasi-geostrophic streamfunction by $p^{\prime }/{\rho }_0=f_0\psi$. Leading horizontal geostrophic balance, $f_0\hat{\mathbf{z}}\times {\mathbf{u}}_g=-{\nabla }_{H}P$, gives $(u_g,v_g)=(-{\psi }_y,{\psi }_x)$. The hydrostatic approximation gives $P_z=\sigma$, henceThus $D_g$ is the material derivative along the leading geostrophic flow, and the vertical derivative of pressure determines the buoyancy perturbation. This also gives thermal wind: $u_{gz}=-{\sigma }_y/f_0$ and $v_{gz}={\sigma }_x/f_0$.

The balanced regime is favored by small Rossby number, a shallow aspect ratio, and a Burger number $N^2{H}^2/(f_0^2{L}^2)$ of order one. Equivalently the stratified Froude number $U/(NH)=\mathrm{Ro}/\sqrt{\mathrm{Bu}}$ is small. On a beta plane, require $\beta L/|f_0|=O(\mathrm{Ro})$, and take slow, initially balanced motion away from the equator. Under the traditional approximation, the horizontal Coriolis force generated by vertical velocity is small because vertical velocity is small, while the vertical rotational force is small compared with the leading hydrostatic pressure and gravity terms. Strong stratification and small aspect ratio justify retaining only the vertical component of Earth's rotation in this regime; this argument is not uniform near the equator.

Put $A(z)=f_0^2/N^2(z)$. The buoyancy equation gives $w=-f_0{D}_g{\psi }_z/N^2$. Substitution into the vertical vorticity equation yieldsThere is an important commutator cancellation. With $J_{xy}(a,b)=a_x{b}_y-a_y{b}_x$,Also $D_{g}f=\beta {\psi }_x$ for $f=f_0+\beta y$. Adding terms therefore proves potential-vorticity conservation:This is the three-dimensional quasi-geostrophic potential vorticity.

At an impermeable stationary lower boundary $z=b(x,y)$, the kinematic condition is $w={\mathbf{u}}_H\cdot {\nabla }_{H}b=D_{g}b$. For small elevation and slope, evaluate this at the reference level $z=0$ to leading order. Combining it with the buoyancy equation gives the rigid-boundary buoyancy condition for quasi-geostrophic wavesThe quantity in parentheses is the boundary displacement plus its buoyancy-equivalent displacement.

Now take constant $N,f$ and the mean quasi-geostrophic streamfunction $\bar{\psi }=-(U_0+\Lambda z)y$. Its mean buoyancy perturbation is $-f\Lambda y$, consistent with thermal wind, and its interior potential vorticity is constant. In the boundary condition, the perturbation velocity $v^{\prime }={\psi }_x^{\prime }$ advects the mean boundary buoyancy gradient. Keeping this contribution givesIn particular the $-\Lambda {\psi }_x^{\prime }$ term must not be omitted.

The linear interior potential-vorticity equation is $({\partial }_t+U(z){\partial }_x)Q^{\prime }=0$. Starting with zero interior perturbation potential vorticity, and with forcing only through the boundary, it remains zero. For a steady solution this is also the regular zero-interior-PV choice, continued through any isolated zero of $U$. The inversion equation for a horizontal mode isThe printed convention $K>0$ takes $f>0$; for either hemisphere the decay rate is defined using $|f|$. Boundedness aloft selects the decaying mode. Writewith real part understood. The linear boundary condition becomesFor $K{U}_0+\Lambda \ne 0$, a steady quasi-geostrophic mountain wave is thereforeOn $y=0$, its real meridional velocity isFor the positive-parameter convention $k,ϵ,f,U_0>0$ and $K{U}_0+\Lambda >0$, the velocity minimum lies one quarter wavelength downstream of each topographic maximum; its maximum lies one quarter wavelength downstream of each topographic minimum. If the velocity prefactor changes sign, maxima and minima interchange. The condition $K{U}_0+\Lambda >0$ alone does not fix that prefactor if $U_0$ is allowed to be negative. The upper panel shows the positive-current convention.

At $K{U}_0+\Lambda =0$, the free boundary Eady edge wave has zero frequency in the ground frame. If $kϵU_0\ne 0$, a steady amplitude cannot satisfy the forced amplitude equation. With $A(0)=0$, integration givesConsequentlyThe symbol multiplying $i$ here is the horizontal wavenumber $k$, as in the PDF. Taking the real part and differentiating in $x$ givesFor $U_0=-\Lambda /K>0$, positive $ϵ,f$, and $t>0$, the meridional-velocity minima coincide with topographic maxima, and its maxima with topographic minima. This is the lower panel. The change from quadrature to opposition is the phase of a resonantly forced topographic edge wave.

The stationary relief continuously excites a boundary Rossby wave whose intrinsic propagation exactly cancels mean advection. The forcing therefore remains coherent with that wave; with no damping or radiation loss for this trapped mode, its linear amplitude grows secularly. This is a resonant topographic quasi-geostrophic wave. Unlimited growth is a conclusion of the linear idealization: eventually the small-disturbance approximation fails.

The assertion that resonance must be unsteady needs nonzero forcing. If $k=0$, then $b_x=0$ and the boundary current does not cross the relief; if $U_0=0$, the forcing also vanishes. In either case the zero disturbance is a steady solution even if $K{U}_0+\Lambda =0$. For example, choose $k=0$, $\ell \ne 0$, and $\Lambda =-K{U}_0$; this is a concrete exception to an unconditional resonance claim. When both horizontal wavenumbers vanish, $K=0$ and the stated decaying-wave ansatz itself does not apply.

Let $\zeta$ denote free-surface height and $h=\zeta -b$ the water depth. The inviscid rotating shallow water equations with constant Coriolis parameter $f$ areIt is $\zeta$, not $h$, that supplies the horizontal pressure gradient. For a fixed bottom, mass conservation equivalently gives $D_{H}h=-h(u_x+v_y)$.

Write $\xi =v_x-u_y$ for relative vorticity. Differentiate the second momentum equation in $x$ and the first in $y$, then subtract. The pressure terms cancel. Expanding the differentiated advection terms givesConsequently the absolute vorticity $q_a=\xi +f$ satisfies $D_H{q}_a=-q_a{\nabla }_H\cdot {\mathbf{u}}_H$. Combining this with mass conservation yields exact shallow-water potential vorticity conservation:A sloping bottom changes the depth and hence the stretching, but contributes no curl to the gravitational pressure force.

For the quasi-geostrophic approximation, choose constant reference depth $H_0$, speed $U$, and horizontal length $L$. Require Rossby number $\mathrm{Ro}=U/(|f|L)\ll 1$, slow evolution on the advective time $L/U$, smooth horizontal scales, and $L/L_D=O(1)$ or smaller, where $L_D=\sqrt{g{H}_0}/|f|$ is the Rossby deformation radius. Write $\zeta ={\zeta }_0+\eta$, $b=b_0+\delta b$, and $h=H_0+\eta -\delta b$. The leading momentum balance is geostrophic balance:It gives $\eta /H_0=O(\mathrm{Ro}(L/L_D{)}^2)$, while we require $\delta b/H_0=O(\mathrm{Ro})$ and slopes on the chosen horizontal scale. Relative vorticity divided by $f$ is also $O(\mathrm{Ro})$. ThusThe derivative of the constant first term vanishes. In advecting the first-order anomaly, the ageostrophic flow contributes only at the next order. Therefore the shallow-water quasi-geostrophic potential vorticity equation isThis retains the balanced vortical branch, including Rossby waves driven here by the topographic potential-vorticity gradient. It filters the freely oscillating inertia–gravity branches of the full shallow water equations, and does not retain independent boundary Kelvin wave dynamics. Small Rossby number alone is insufficient for the reduction: fast waves must be absent at leading order, as in well-prepared balanced initial data.

In the channel take $H_0=h_{00}$ and measure the bottom anomaly from mid-channel: $\delta b=\epsilon (y-L/2)$. Define $\beta =\epsilon f/H_0$. The resting potential vorticity is $\beta (y-L/2)$, and the linear Rossby wave equation isFor nonzero zonal wavenumber $k$, wall conditions $\psi =0$ selectThe $k=0$ modes are stationary. Write $K^2=k^2+(n\pi /L{)}^2+L_D^{-2}$ and take real $A$ for the following sketch. The total potential vorticity is $q=\beta (y-L/2)-K^2\psi$. For a contour whose undisturbed position is $y_0$, its small meridional displacement isThus potential-vorticity conservation says a northward displacement in a positive background gradient carries a negative anomaly, $q^{\prime }=-\beta \delta y$. Potential-vorticity inversion turns this into positive $\psi$ and anticyclonic motion around the bulge. At a positive cosine crest, $v={\psi }_x$ is northward on its western flank and southward on its eastern flank. Advection raises the contour on the west and lowers it on the east, so the crest moves west. Algebraically, $\delta y_t=v$ and $\delta y=(K^2/\beta )\psi$ give $\omega /k=-\beta /K^2$, the same phase velocity as above. For $\beta <0$ all propagation directions reverse.

For a square basin use a nonzero-frequency normal mode $\psi =\mathrm{Re}\{\Psi (x,y)e^{-i\omega t}\}$, with $\Psi =0$ on all walls. Its equation isSet $\alpha =\beta /(2\omega )$ and $\hat{\Psi }=e^{i\alpha x}\Psi$. Substitution cancels the first derivative and givesThe square's Dirichlet Laplacian eigenfunctions are $\hat{\Psi }=A\sin (m\pi x/L)\sin (n\pi y/L)$, with $m,n$ positive integers. Consequently the square-basin topographic Rossby mode hasFor $\beta >0$, the positive-frequency branch therefore tends to $\beta L/[2\pi \sqrt{m^2+n^2}]$ as $L/L_D\to 0$, as required. The negative-frequency solution is its complex-conjugate representation for a real disturbance; the physical frequency magnitude is $|\beta |/[2\sqrt{{\pi }^2(m^2+n^2)/L^2+L_D^{-2}}]$.

Take $\mathbf{f}=f\hat{\mathbf{z}}$ with $f>0$, and put $\zeta =v_x-u_y$, $d=u_x+v_y$ and $q=\zeta -f\eta /H$. Here $q$ denotes the signed vertical component of the linearized shallow-water potential-vorticity anomaly, rather than its magnitude. The divergence and vertical curl of the linearized shallow water equations giveConsequently $q_t=0$. Eliminating $d$ and substituting $\zeta =q+f\eta /H$ givesThe vector forcing is $-H\mathbf{f}\cdot \mathbf{q}$. This is potential-vorticity conservation in its linear, f-plane form: the conserved anomaly forces a stationary balanced part, while the homogeneous equation supports inertial-gravity waves.

For the initial strip, differentiating the discontinuous velocity in the sense of distributions givesThese are two oppositely signed vortex sheets. In the final geostrophic balance, $v_f=0$ and $u_f=-g{\eta }_f^{\prime }/f$. The height therefore solvesThis is the Rossby deformation radius. Decay at infinity fixes the Green function to $G(y)=-\lambda e^{-|y|/\lambda }/2$. Thus the geostrophic adjustment of a finite-width current has the particularly useful representationExpanding the exponentials inside the strip gives ${\eta }_f/H=-(U/c)e^{-a/\lambda }\sinh (y/\lambda )$; above the strip it gives $-(U/c)e^{-y/\lambda }\sinh (a/\lambda )$, and below it gives $(U/c)e^{y/\lambda }\sinh (a/\lambda )$. The height is continuous, odd and exponentially localized. Its derivative has the jumps required by the two Dirac delta functions.

Differentiating the height, rather than assuming a uniform final current, gives the complete velocity:The one-sided velocity jump is $U$ at each edge, with opposite orientations. The value exactly on an idealized vortex sheet is immaterial. Inside the strip the current remains in the original direction; outside it a return current develops.

Let $r=a/\lambda$ and $s=y/\lambda$. For $r\ll 1$, $u_f/U=1-r+O(r^2)$ over the narrow strip, while the outside return flow is approximately $-r{e}^{-|s|}$. The height varies almost linearly across the strip, $c{\eta }_f/(HU)\simeq -s$, and has extrema of magnitude $(1-e^{-2r})/2\simeq r$ at its edges. For $r\gg 1$, the central current is exponentially small: $u_f(0)/U=e^{-r}$. Each edge supports a layer of width $\lambda$, with $u_f/U\simeq \frac{1}{2}{e}^{-(a-|y|)/\lambda }$ on its inner side and $-\frac{1}{2}{e}^{-(|y|-a)/\lambda }$ outside. The corresponding height extrema approach $\pm HU/(2c)$, with almost zero height deep inside and far outside. Both requested profiles are drawn from the exact functions below; the dashed jumps represent one-sided velocity limits.

For balanced shallow-water energy as a signed potential-vorticity pairing, divide out the constant density and work per unit distance in $x$. The kinetic energy plus surface potential energy isMultiplication of the stationary height equation by ${\eta }_f$ and integration by parts, with vanishing end terms, yieldsThe same expression holds with $dA$ for a finite two-dimensional domain or a finite periodic length in $x$. The infinite strip's total energy is infinite, so both energies and their ratio are understood per unit $x$-length.

There is a sign defect in the printed energy expression: $|\mathbf{q}|$ must be replaced by the signed component $\hat{\mathbf{f}}\cdot \mathbf{q}$. Indeed, $|q_0|=|U|[\delta (y-a)+\delta (y+a)]$, so pairing it with the odd ${\eta }_f$ gives zero, although the balanced state has positive energy. The signed pairing givesSince $E_i=H{U}^{2}a$, the energy retention in finite-width geostrophic adjustment isFor $r\ll 1$ this ratio is $1-r+\frac{2}{3}{r}^2+O(r^3)$: nearly all energy remains in the narrow balanced current. For $r\gg 1$ it is approximately $1/(2r)$: only the edge regions retain balanced energy. Conservation of energy still holds for the inviscid evolution. The missing balanced energy is carried away by inertia-gravity waves; “final state” means the local balanced limit after those waves leave, rather than a loss of the total energy over the entire infinite domain.

On a sphere of radius $R$ rotating at angular speed $\Omega$, the Coriolis parameter is $f=2\Omega \sin \varphi$. Near latitude ${\varphi }_0$, write $y=R(\varphi -{\varphi }_0)$, use locally eastward and northward Cartesian coordinates, and expandThe beta plane retains the first northward variation of planetary vorticity while neglecting higher latitude dependence and metric curvature. A midlatitude local calculation assumes $L/R\ll 1$ and $|\beta |L/|f_0|\ll 1$; near the equator the distinct equatorial beta plane has $f_0=0$, so the midlatitude low-frequency reduction used below does not apply.

For a homogeneous shallow layer, the hydrostatic approximation gives $p=p_{\mathrm{atm}}+\rho g(\eta -z)$ and hence $p_x/\rho =g{\eta }_x$, $p_y/\rho =g{\eta }_y$, independently of depth. The approximation follows from the small aspect ratio $H/L$ and neglect of vertical acceleration. Differentiate the linear horizontal momentum equations in $z$. Their depth derivatives obeyStarting from rest gives $u_z=v_z=0$ initially, and the unique solution remains zero. This establishes depth independence of hydrostatic shallow-water flow; an arbitrary pre-existing shear would not be removed merely by taking the hydrostatic approximation. Integrating the continuity equation between the rigid bottom and the moving surface gives ${\eta }_t+H(u_x+v_y)=0$ at linear order. With the depth-integrated shallow-water transports $U=Hu$, $V=Hv$, one obtains