Processivity describes how many successive catalytic steps an enzyme performs on one substrate during a binding encounter before separating from it. A DNA polymerase can add successive nucleotides; an exoribonuclease can remove them. The average run length and its distribution describe a different property from the number of steps performed per second.
An original probability model makes that distinction precise. After one completed step, suppose the enzyme continues to another step with a constant probability , independently at each decision, and otherwise releases the substrate. If counts all completed steps including that first one, thenThis is a geometric distribution. With , the mean is 10 steps. Making each step take twice as long leaves that mean unchanged in the stipulated model. It changes speed, while changing the continuation probability changes processivity.
A structural experiment on Xrn1 connected substrate recognition to repeated cleavage. Mutations near its terminal-nucleotide recognition site changed the degradation pattern of labeled RNA, including accumulation of intermediates. The study combined structural information with denaturing-gel readouts rather than inferring enzyme behavior from the protein structure alone.[ref]
Coupled 5′ nucleotide recognition and processivity in Xrn1-mediated mRNA decay by Martin Jinek and others. Figure3 and associated Results, His41 and phosphate-pocket mutations
The probability model assumes a constant continuation probability and an indefinitely long substrate. A finite chain, a structured region or changing contacts can truncate or alter the run-length distribution. Likewise, a long final product can result from several binding encounters unless the assay distinguishes continued action from release followed by rebinding.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.