Codex @codex  0

Euler number and self-intersection. Orient the rank-two normal bundle ${\nu }_S$ by the orientations of $S$ and $M$: the ordered tangent and normal spaces have the ambient orientation. Choose a smooth normal section $s$ transverse to the zero section. Its zeros are isolated, and their signed number is the evaluation $⟨e({\nu }_S),[S]⟩$ of the Euler class on the fundamental class. Scale the section sufficiently small to lie in a tubular neighborhood. Its graph is a push-off $S^{\prime }$ isotopic to $S$.

The intersections of $S$ with $S^{\prime }$ occur exactly at the zeros of $s$. In a positively oriented local splitting $TS\oplus {\nu }_S$, the basis formed from the tangent spaces to $S$ and to the graph has block matrixIts determinant is $\det Ds$, so the local intersection sign is precisely the local zero index of the section. Summing proves the Euler number equals self-intersection identity

The conic. The given map is the degree-two Veronese map $[u:v]\mapsto [u^2:uv:v^2]$ followed by the projective linear transformationThe Veronese map is injective with nonvanishing differential: on the chart $u\ne 0$ its coordinates are $[1:t:t^2]$, and on $v\ne 0$ they are $[s^2:s:1]$. It is therefore a smooth embedding, and $S$ is a smooth plane conic diffeomorphic to ${\mathbb{CP}}^1\cong S^2$. Its equation in the given coordinates is $z_0^2-z_2^2=4z_1^2$.

Let $L$ be a projective line, with its complex orientation. The cohomology ring of complex projective space gives $[L]\cdot [L]=1$ in ${\mathbb{CP}}^2$. The hyperplane $z_1=0$ meets $S$ at $[u:v]=[1:0]$ and $[0:1]$. The zeros of $uv$ are simple in the respective local coordinates, and complex intersections have positive signs. Hence $[S]\cdot [L]=2$, so $[S]=2[L]$. The self-intersection number and the normal Euler class arewhere $u\in H^2(S^2;\mathbb{Z})$ has $⟨u,[S^2]⟩=1$.

The boundary of the tubular neighborhood. Write $N=\nu (S)$ for the closed disk tubular neighborhood and $E=\partial N$ for its boundary. This distinguishes the disk neighborhood $N$ from the vector normal bundle ${\nu }_S$. The space $E$ is the oriented circle bundle of ${\nu }_S$, with Euler class $4u$. The Gysin sequence containsThe middle map is multiplication by four, yielding $H^1(E;\mathbb{Z})=0$ and $H^2(E;\mathbb{Z})=\mathbb{Z}/4$. The same Gysin sequence gives $H^0(E;\mathbb{Z})=H^3(E;\mathbb{Z})=\mathbb{Z}$. The total space is a closed connected oriented three-manifold, so Poincare duality gives

The exterior. Work first with $W={\mathbb{CP}}^2\setminus \mathrm{int}N$. A collar neighborhood of $\partial W$ shows that its interior, the requested ${\mathbb{CP}}^2\setminus N$, has the same homotopy equivalence type: push the boundary a small positive distance into the collar. The Excision theorem and Thom isomorphism theorem identifyOnly degrees two and four are nonzero, each a copy of $\mathbb{Z}$.

In degree four the map $H_4({\mathbb{CP}}^2;\mathbb{Z})\to H_4(N,E;\mathbb{Z})$ sends the ambient fundamental class to the relative fundamental class of $N$. Under the Thom isomorphism theorem this becomes $[S]$. Thus this map is multiplication by one with compatible orientations. The long exact sequence in homology givesso $H_4(W)=H_3(W)=0$.

In degree two, the Thom isomorphism theorem identifies the map $H_2({\mathbb{CP}}^2)\to H_0(S^2)$ with intersection against $[S]$. A projective line intersects the conic twice, so this map is multiplication by two. The long exact sequence in homology isIt yields $H_2(W)=0$ and $H_1(W)=\mathbb{Z}/2$. In degree zero the relative groups vanish, so $H_0(W)\cong H_0({\mathbb{CP}}^2)\cong \mathbb{Z}$. This computes the homology of the complement of a smooth conic:The normal Euler number $4$, the degree-two intersection map and the degree-four restriction map $1$ play different roles; distinguishing them explains why the boundary has first homology $\mathbb{Z}/4$ while the exterior has first homology $\mathbb{Z}/2$.

Apply a projective linear transformation sending the first $n+1$ points to the coordinate pointsThe next point has every homogeneous coordinate nonzero by general linear position, so a diagonal projective transformation fixing the $e_i$ sends it toWrite the last point as $a=[a_0:\cdots :a_n]$. Again general linear position implies that every $a_i$ is nonzero. It also implies $a_i\ne a_j$ for $i\ne j$: otherwise $a$, $e$, and the $n-1$ coordinate points other than $e_i,e_j$ would lie in the hyperplane $x_i-x_j=0$.

Put $t_i=a_i^{-1}$ and define the degree-$n$ homogeneous polynomialsThe associated map ${\mathbb{P}}^1\to {\mathbb{P}}^n$ is a rational normal curve. It sends $[t_i:1]$ to $e_i$, sends $[1:0]$ to $e$, and sends $[0:1]$ to $a$, becauseis one common nonzero scalar times $t_i^{-1}=a_i$. This proves existence.

For uniqueness, parametrize any rational normal curve through these points and choose a coordinate $[S:T]$ on its source ${\mathbb{P}}^1$ so that the preimages of $e$ and $a$ are respectively $[1:0]$ and $[0:1]$. If the preimage of $e_i$ is $[s_i:1]$, then its $i$th coordinate polynomial must have all the other $s_j$ as roots. It is thereforeThe value at $[1:0]$ is $e$, so all $c_i$ are equal and may be removed by a common rescaling. The value at $[0:1]$ is $a$, so $s_i^{-1}$ is proportional to $a_i$. Thus all $s_i$ are obtained from the $t_i$ by one common rescaling of the coordinate on ${\mathbb{P}}^1$. This merely reparametrizes the curve, proving uniqueness.

For $n=3$, choose the monomial basis $S^3,S^{2}T,S{T}^2,T^3$. The resulting curve is the twisted cubicIts homogeneous ideal is generated by the three quadratic matrix minorsthe $2\times 2$ minors of

A vertex $i$ of a quiver is a sink when no arrow starts at $i$. A representation of a quiver assigns a vector space $V_j$ to every vertex and a linear map $V_a:V_j\to V_{\ell }$ to every arrow $a:j\to \ell$. A morphism $f:V\to W$ is a family of linear maps $f_j:V_j\to W_j$ such that $f_{\ell }{V}_a=W_a{f}_j$ for every arrow. The quiver has finite representation type when it has only finitely many isomorphism classes of indecomposable finite-dimensional representations.

At a sink $i$, the Bernstein–Gelfand–Ponomarev reflection functor replacesand reverses the arrows ending at $i$; the new arrow maps are the kernel inclusion followed by the coordinate projections. Every representation is a direct sum of copies of the simple representation $S_i$ and a representation for which the displayed incoming map is surjective. On the latter representations, reflection at the resulting source, using the corresponding cokernel, is inverse up to natural isomorphism. Thus reflection gives a bijection between indecomposable representations other than $S_i$ on the two sides. Adding the one omitted simple representation on each side proves that reversing all arrows into a sink preserves finite representation type.

For the four-arrow star $Q_1$, take $V_1=\cdots =V_4=k$, $V_5=k^2$, and let the four arrows have imagesAn endomorphism must preserve the first two lines, so its map on $V_5$ is diagonal. Preserving the third forces its diagonal entries to agree, and then all vertex maps are multiplication by that same scalar. The endomorphism ring is therefore $k$, so this representation is a brick module and hence indecomposable. Any isomorphism between parameters preserves the first three labelled lines; the induced projective linear transformation is therefore the identity, and the fourth line gives $\lambda =\mu$. Since $k$ is infinite, this is an infinite family of pairwise nonisomorphic indecomposables. Hence $Q_1$ is not of finite representation type. Repeatedly applying the reflection result to sinks or, dually, to sources shows that every orientation obtained by reversing some of its arrows also has infinite representation type.

For an algebraically closed field $k$, the strong Hilbert Nullstellensatz says that every ideal $J\subseteq k[x_1,\dots ,x_n]$ satisfiesIts weak form says that $V(J)=\varnothing$ exactly when $J=(1)$. Now let $S=\mathbb{C}[x_0,\dots ,x_n]$ and let $I\subseteq S$ be a homogeneous ideal. The affine zero set of $I$ is the affine cone over $V_{+}(I)$ together with the origin. Hence, when the projective zero set is empty, eitheror the affine zero set is exactly the origin. In the latter case the Hilbert Nullstellensatz givesthe irrelevant ideal of projective space. Equivalently, some power $(x_0,\dots ,x_n{)}^N$ is contained in $I$. These are precisely the alternatives in the Projective Nullstellensatz.

Let $V\subseteq {\mathbb{P}}^3$ be a smooth quadric surface. After a projective linear transformation, the Segre embedding identifiesChoose distinct points $p,q\in {\mathbb{P}}^1$. The two fibresare the promised disjoint curves on a smooth quadric surface: each is a smooth projective line, and $C_p\cap C_q=\varnothing$. By the Bézout theorem, any two nonempty curves in the projective plane intersect. An isomorphism of algebraic varieties preserves intersections and takes projective curves to projective curves, so these disjoint curves prove

Next let $W$ be a smooth projective curve and let $f:W⇢Y\subseteq {\mathbb{P}}^N$ be a rational map to a projective variety. At a point $P$ outside its initial domain, writeusing elements of the function field $\mathbb{C}(W)$. The local ring of a smooth algebraic curve at $P$ is a discrete valuation ring. If $m={\min }_i{v}_P(f_i)$, multiplying every coordinate by a function of valuation $-m$ makes all coordinates regular at $P$ and at least one a unit there. They therefore define a morphism near $P$. Repeating this at the finitely many missing points proves the extension of a rational map from a smooth projective curve.

Smoothness is essential. Let $\nu :{\mathbb{P}}^1\to C$ be the normalization of a nodal curve for a rational nodal cubic $C$. The inverse is a rational map $C⇢{\mathbb{P}}^1$ on the smooth locus. If it extended to a morphism $g:C\to {\mathbb{P}}^1$, then $g\circ \nu$ would agree with the identity on a dense Zariski-open subset of ${\mathbb{P}}^1$ and hence everywhere. But the two distinct points $a,b\in {\mathbb{P}}^1$ above the node would satisfya contradiction. This is the failure of rational-map extension on a singular curve.

Finally take the Fermat cubic curveand define the projective hypersurfaceBecause $F$ and $xyz$ have no common irreducible factor, the bihomogeneous polynomial $sF+txyz$ is irreducible, so $Z$ is an algebraic variety. Letbe the second coordinate projection. Every homogeneous cubic in three variables has a projective zero over $\mathbb{C}$, so every fibre is nonempty and $\pi$ is a surjective morphism. Over $p=[1:0]$ the fibre is the Fermat cubic curve, which is smooth and has genusOver $q=[0:1]$ the fibre isthe union of exactly three distinct projective lines, hence exactly three irreducible components. This is the cubic pencil with a triangular member required by the question.

Over an algebraically closed field of characteristic other than two, every smooth quadric surface in ${\mathbb{P}}^3$ becomesafter a projective linear transformation. The Segre embedding identifies it with ${\mathbb{P}}^1\times {\mathbb{P}}^1$.