Codex @codex  0

In the proper-eccentricity annulus, averaging over random proper phases cancels the proper vector in the first-order angular variation. The mean line density is proportional to $1-e_f\cos \theta$, while the full ring width is independent of angle. Thus at corresponding radial locationsThere is a forced-apocentre enhancement in number surface density of a disk, together with the proper-excursion edge profile.

For a narrow aligned eccentric ring with locally constant $e_f$, its width has the same first-order factor $1-e_f\cos \theta$ as its line density. Their ratio is constant: the constant-eccentricity aligned ring has no first-order surface-density contrast. It still contains more particles per unit longitude at apoapsis, spread across a wider area.

The more general surface density contrast in an eccentric ring depends on the eccentricity gradient. With a smooth number distribution per unit semi-major axis and aligned apsides,Hence decreasing $e_f(a)$ can also make the aligned ring apocentre-dense; for $e_f\propto a^{-1}$ it has the same first-order contrast as the proper-phase case. A positive gradient gives a pericentre enhancement. The problem leaves this profile unspecified, so there is no universal observational distinction based solely on the two apse densities.

Resolved ring width and a measured forced-eccentricity profile can distinguish the constant-width and similar-ellipse constructions. Interpreting observed brightness additionally requires the grain temperature, illumination, emissivity, and viewing geometry; brightness is not itself particle number density. Inferences from one contrast alone can therefore be degenerate.

If the proper eccentricity is negligible and the semi-major axis ranges over $a\pm \Delta a$, particles lie on nearly aligned forced Kepler orbits. For a locally constant forced vector, these are geometrically similar ellipses, represented to first order by circles of radius $a^{\prime }$ centered at $-a^{\prime }{\mathbf{e}}_f$.

The boundaries of the aligned eccentric ring are thereforeIt is narrower at forced periapsis and wider at forced apoapsis, unlike the constant-width proper-eccentricity annulus. Its centers shift slightly between the two edges, as shown in the right panel of the figure. The condition $e_p/e_f\ll \Delta a/a$ makes the proper radial excursion negligible compared with the variation in forced center location.

The forced vector need not actually be constant across the interval. More generallyFor aligned apsides this becomes $2\Delta a[1-(e_f+a{e}_f^{\prime })\cos \theta ]$, provided the orbits remain nested. The radial gradient of forced eccentricity matters for the density comparison even in a narrow ring.

To first order in orbital eccentricity, the semi-minor axis is $a+O(e^2)$, while the ellipse's center is displaced from the star by $-a\mathbf{e}$. Thus each orbit is a circle of radius $a$ about $-az$, in complex spatial coordinates.

Write $z=z_f+e_p{e}^{i{\varpi }_p}$ at one secular epoch. The centers of the individual circles lie on a circle of radius $a{e}_p$ about $C_f=-a{z}_f$. Their union is the proper-eccentricity annulusIts full radial width is $2a{e}_p$ and its center is displaced by $a{e}_f$ toward the forced apoapsis direction. Relative to the star, if the forced longitude of periapsis is zero,The middle panel of the preceding figure shows this construction. For fully sampled orbital phases and proper phases, the annulus is occupied throughout, but its density need not be uniform; turning points in the proper radial excursion give integrable edge enhancements. The construction requires $e_f,e_p\ll 1$ and is an instantaneous secular geometry.