Diorite 2026-10-25
A coarse-grained intrusive rock with intermediate composition, commonly containing plagioclase and amphibole or pyroxene.
Mafic mineral 2026-10-25
A useful idealization is a thin sedimentary cover over a felsic upper continental crust, an intermediate middle continental crust, and a more mafic lower continental crust, ending at the Mohorovičić discontinuity at about 35–40 km. The boundaries within the continental crust are approximate compositional divisions, not three universal sharp interfaces.
An idealized modern continental crustal column
. An original schematic for a 38 km thick continental crust. Depth ranges illustrate a compositional tendency; individual provinces have different lithologies and boundaries. Details.- At the surface, a variable, commonly kilometre-scale sedimentary cover contains sediments and sedimentary rocks. Exposed crystalline basement can instead occur at the surface.
- In the upper roughly 15 km, representative rocks are granite, granodiorite and compositionally related gneiss, with quartz and feldspar. Sedimentary rocks, metamorphic rocks and volcanic rocks make this layer heterogeneous.
- At roughly 15–25 km, intermediate gneiss and amphibolite-facies assemblages become important. Diorite to granodiorite compositions and amphibole- and plagioclase-bearing rocks are representative.
- At roughly 25–38 km, mafic granulite and gabbro-derived metamorphic rocks are a useful average, with plagioclase, pyroxene and sometimes garnet. Some provinces instead have substantially intermediate or felsic lower continental crust.
- Below the Mohorovičić discontinuity is peridotite of the mantle, dominated by olivine and pyroxene. This is not a fourth crustal layer.
The important trend is increasing average mafic character with depth, rather than a change from granite directly to peridotite. Granulite describes a metamorphic facies, not a unique chemical composition. The synthesis in Nature and composition of the continental crust: A lower crustal perspective by Roberta L. Rudnick and David M. Fountain combines seismic and petrological evidence for these distinctions.
Hotter Archean mantle would generally produce thicker, more magnesium-rich oceanic crust, together with a more strongly depleted residual mantle. Greater melt production, not merely thermal expansion of an unchanged modern column, is the principal reason for the increased crustal thickness.
At a spreading ridge, upwelling peridotite undergoes adiabatic decompression melting. A higher mantle potential temperature makes the ascending mantle intersect the solidus at greater pressure and depth. It therefore melts over a longer decompression interval and generally reaches a larger integrated melt fraction. With comparable melt focusing, more melt is supplied per unit area of newly formed oceanic crust.
Modern normal oceanic crust is about 6–7 km thick and contains basaltic lavas, a sheeted dike complex, and gabbro with mafic cumulates at depth. An illustrative reconstruction for hot ambient Archean mantle gives about 25–35 km of oceanic crust, rather than a universal fixed thickness. Its primary liquids are more magnesium-rich than typical modern primary ridge liquids; their crystallization produces more olivine- and pyroxene-rich cumulates. The extracted liquid and its crystal products must be distinguished: the entire final oceanic crust need not be a homogeneous komatiite layer.[ref]
The residual peridotite loses more melt components, becoming more refractory and commonly harzburgite-rich. Thick buoyant basaltic crust, its later eclogitization, and the depleted underlying mantle can change the mechanics of subduction. A hotter mantle does not by itself establish how fast plates moved or whether a globally connected modern plate tectonics regime operated.
Komatiites, with very magnesium-rich primary liquids and high inferred eruption temperatures, provide evidence for hot melting, but may sample especially hot mantle plumes. Estimates of ambient mantle conditions also use less exceptional non-arc basalts. Variable source composition, water content, cooling, melt extraction and later alteration all limit the precision of a single inferred Archean thickness. The robust prediction is a larger melting column and melt yield, thicker igneous oceanic crust, and a more depleted residue.
