For an orthonormal scaling function satisfying , its low-pass Fourier series symbol is . The scaling refinement equation becomes . The symbol is initially an almost-everywhere defined periodic function; the assumption that the scaling function is Lebesgue integrable alone does not make it smooth. The orthonormal translates give the quadrature mirror filter identity.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 iii Paper 62 6 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
An orthonormal multiresolution analysis consists of closed subspaces , , with , , , and the dilation equivalence . A scaling function has integer translates forming an orthonormal basis of . Henceis an orthonormal basis of . Set , the orthogonal complement of inside . A function whose integer translates form an orthonormal basis of produces a complete orthonormal wavelet system : different are orthogonal, their sum contains every difference , and density together with the zero intersection exhausts .
Here is the filter construction that guarantees such a wavelet. Nesting puts in , so expansion in its orthonormal basis gives the scaling refinement equation , with . Define the MRA low-pass filter and its complementary quadrature mirror filter bySplitting the orthonormal translates and Fourier periodization identity at , as in part (b), gives almost everywhere. Consequently the rows ofhave length one and are orthogonal; the matrix is unitary. Put and , so .
To see completeness as well as orthogonality, identify with its fine-scale coefficient sequences and take their Fourier series. Group the frequencies and over a half-period. The two rows of the displayed matrix are the normalized coarse and complementary channels; their unitarity is exactly an onto isometry from these two channels to the fine-scale coefficient space. Translates of and correspond to the Fourier basis in the respective channels. They therefore jointly form an orthonormal basis of . The orthogonal complement channel gives the wavelet completion of a multiresolution filter, namely the integer translates of span . This proves the asserted relation with an orthonormal wavelet.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 70 6 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
An orthonormal multiresolution analysis consists of closed subspaces of a Hilbert space of the Hilbert space such thatThere is a scaling function whose integer function translations form an orthonormal basis of . Consequently form an orthonormal basis of ; in particular is invariant under integer function translations.
Let be the orthogonal complement of in . Nesting, density and the trivial intersection imply the orthogonal direct sumFor example, telescoping and letting , gives this decomposition; the corresponding orthogonal projections converge strongly to zero and the identity by the intersection and density properties.
To construct the orthonormal wavelet, use to write the scaling refinement equation , with and . Put . The orthonormal translates and Fourier periodization criterion proved in part (b), applied to the scaling refinement equation, yieldsThis is the quadrature mirror filter identity. DefineThe Fourier series of is , and . The two rows and form a unitary matrix almost everywhere: both have squared norm one and their inner product is zero. This wavelet completion of a multiresolution filter proves not just orthogonality but completeness. Splitting a finer-scale coefficient Fourier series into its values at and , this invertible two-channel matrix resolves it into a coarse-scale channel and its complementary channel. Thus the integer function translations of form an orthonormal basis of .
The dilated functions therefore form an orthonormal basis of each . The orthogonal direct sum proves the conclusion: every orthonormal multiresolution analysis produces an orthonormal wavelet basis of .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 iii Paper 69 2 A Solution 2026-10-06
An orthonormal multiresolution analysis consists of closed subspaces of the L2 space with , dense union, intersection , and the dilation rule . A scaling function has integer translates forming an orthonormal basis of . Equivalently,form an orthonormal basis of . Let . Density and the trivial intersection imply .
Nesting gives the scaling refinement equation , with the coefficients in the normalized finer-scale basis. Orthogonality of the translates gives . Its Fourier form is the quadrature mirror filter identity , where .
Set and define in . Its high-pass symbol is . The matrixis unitary almost everywhere. Under the identification of with its finer-scale coefficient space, this two-channel unitary transform splits that space into the translates of and the translates of . The latter are therefore an orthonormal basis of . Dilating gives an orthonormal wavelet basisThis wavelet completion of a multiresolution filter explains how the multiresolution analysis supplies a single orthonormal wavelet. The argument uses coefficient-space completeness, not just pairwise orthogonality.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 340 1 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Use the Fourier transform convention . An orthonormal multiresolution analysis is a family of closed vector subspaces , indexed by integers, with , , and . Its dilation condition is if and only if . The space is invariant under integer function translations and admits a scaling function whose integer function translations form an orthonormal basis. Consequently form an orthonormal basis of .
Since , expansion in that orthonormal basis gives the scaling refinement equationThe series converges in the L2 norm. The associated low-pass filter of a multiresolution analysis is the periodic Fourier series symbolInitially the symbol is defined almost everywhere. Orthonormal integer function translations give the quadrature mirror filter identity almost everywhere. For a Lebesgue integrable scaling function, its Fourier transform is continuous and ; choosing a constant phase makes and the continuous representative near zero has . Different conventions absorb into the refinement coefficients; the displayed convention fixes that ambiguity.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 340 1 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Let denote the orthogonal complement of inside . The Meyer-Mallat theorem constructs a wavelet whose integer function translations form an orthonormal basis of . Dilation then gives the orthogonal decomposition into orthogonal complements , so its translates and dilates form an orthonormal wavelet basis.
Using the MRA low-pass filter, choose the high-pass symbol . The quadrature mirror filter identity makes the two analysis channels orthonormal. The resulting Fourier transform formula isEquivalently, with the refinement coefficients from the scaling refinement equation, put and . This index choice gives precisely the displayed high-pass symbol. Changing all by one constant unit phase gives the same orthonormal wavelet construction. In particular the often-used convention differs only by a global minus sign. The basis is for .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 340 1 c Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
A wavelet with vanishing moments satisfies and for . The moment differentiation of the Fourier transform theorem states that these weighted integrability hypotheses make , with . Hence . The MRA projection Fourier identity, together with density of the approximation spaces and continuity of at zero, gives . These are the two analytic theorems needed in addition to the quadrature mirror filter construction.
For the ordinary derivative conclusion, assume also that the MRA low-pass filter is near and is near zero. These hypotheses hold, for example, for a compactly supported scaling function with a finite refinement filter. The wavelet identity givesThe denominator is nonzero near zero. Its reciprocal and the exponential are , so the product rule and the zero Taylor polynomial of give the smooth-mask vanishing-moment criterion
The printed integrability hypothesis alone does not guarantee ordinary higher derivatives. It gives only a continuous . Without added smoothness, Taylor theorem for still gives for the representative defined by the quotient: a Peano zero. This establishes the value at , and for the first derivative there, but it does not automatically establish iterated derivatives.
Here is a lacunary scaling-phase regularity counterexample for . Start with a compactly supported Daubechies wavelet having vanishing moments, with scaling function and finite MRA low-pass filter . Define the periodic phaseThe Fourier coefficients of are absolutely summable. The Wiener algebra is closed under multiplication and the exponential series, so and have absolutely summable Fourier coefficients. Thus is an absolutely summable combination of integer function translations of , belongs to , and generates the same . Unimodularity preserves orthogonality and unit norm of its integer function translations; the inverse phase preserves their complete span. The same approximation spaces therefore give a multiresolution analysis.
The identity gives , so the periodic phase change of a scaling function produces . In the high-pass formula the phases cancel:The associated wavelet is therefore exactly the original one, with unchanged vanishing moments.
At any dyadic point , the difference quotient of the terms with is per term. The sum of these errors and the remaining tail divided by are bounded; the finitely many earlier terms have finite limits. Hence , which has no finite limit. The exponential has the same failure of differentiability. Dyadic points are dense, and is nonzero for sufficiently small . Thus is not differentiable on any neighborhood of , so an ordinary second derivative at , understood as the derivative of a locally defined first derivative, need not exist. The Peano zero remains valid. This separates the intended smooth-mask theorem from what the literal assumptions establish.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 340 1 d Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Under the smoothness hypotheses in the smooth-mask vanishing-moment criterion, write any nonzero integer as , where and is odd, possibly negative. Iterating the scaling refinement equation exactly times givesThe last MRA low-pass filter factor is . Its derivatives of all orders less than vanish at , because is odd and the MRA low-pass filter is -periodic. If the remaining factors are at the displayed arguments, the product rule forces every derivative of order less than of the product to vanish. In particular compact support and a finite MRA low-pass filter supply all these hypotheses. Therefore the integer-frequency zeros of a scaling function are
Under only the printed assumptions, the exact same finite refinement argument gives the Peano zero . Indeed, the last MRA low-pass filter factor has that estimate, the other MRA low-pass filter factors are bounded by one almost everywhere by the quadrature mirror filter identity, and the last Fourier transform factor is bounded because . The estimate initially holds almost everywhere and extends to every by continuity of . It does not imply arbitrary ordinary higher derivatives. In the lacunary scaling-phase regularity counterexample, is nondifferentiable at dense dyadic points next to the isolated integer-frequency zeros of the smooth base transform. Thus the same regularity qualification is necessary here.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 iii Paper 340 1 c Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
Put , the detail space of the multiresolution analysis. The Meyer-Mallat theorem gives a function whose integer translates form an orthonormal basis of . Dilations then give an orthonormal basis of each , and the density and trivial-intersection axioms implyFor an explicit filter construction, write the scaling refinement equation . With a quadrature mirror filter one may take and . A harmless constant sign or integer translation gives an equivalent orthonormal wavelet.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 iii Paper 340 2 a i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
Use the Fourier transform convention . Nesting and the orthonormal basis of give the scaling refinement equationHere . Compact support makes these inner products zero for all but finitely many , so is a trigonometric polynomial. Expanding the orthogonality of the integer translates of in the orthonormal basis of yieldsConsequentlyThis holds everywhere because is continuous. The invoked properties are nesting, dyadic dilation, orthonormal integer translates, and compact support; mere finite-energy refinement would not imply the quadrature mirror filter identity.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 iii Paper 340 2 c Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
The factor has a simple zero at , and makes the zero of there exactly order . The quadrature mirror filter construction gives a high-pass symbol , up to a constant phase, andThe normalized scaling function has , so has a zero of exactly order at zero. Compact support of the Daubechies wavelet permits differentiation under its Fourier transform:HenceThere are exactly vanishing moments, rather than just at least .
For a scaling refinement equation , set . The quadrature mirror filter identity makes the two rows and a unitary matrix, where . The complementary coefficients yield . In a multiresolution analysis, coefficient-space completeness shows its translates form an orthonormal basis of , hence its dilations and translates form an orthonormal wavelet basis of the whole space.