For a finite irreducible Markov chain that is an aperiodic Markov chain, set
Here is its unique stationary distribution, and the distance is total variation distance. Applying a Markov kernel contracts total variation distance, so is nonincreasing and the minimum is finite.
Use the ratio definition of cutoff: a family has cutoff for Markov chains if, for every fixed ,
with the denominator positive eventually. Thus the transition between any two fixed distance levels takes negligible time compared with the mixing time scale. By monotonicity and squeezing, this also gives for any fixed .
Some definitions of cutoff for Markov chains additionally require the mixing time to diverge. That extra requirement cannot be built into the definition here: the final request in part (d) explicitly asks for a bounded-time counterexample. The ratio convention is the one consistent with that request.
Use the ratio definition of cutoff from part (a), and write . In the reversible Markov chain setting of the preceding parts let and . In particular .
If did not tend to infinity, there would be a subsequence and for which . Along it part (c) implies, for every fixed ,
Since , choose fixed so small that . The lower limit of this ratio is then greater than one, contradicting cutoff for Markov chains. Thus the Peres product condition holds:
In fact the argument with proves the stronger absolute-gap product condition. Part (d) does not repeat the reversible Markov chain hypothesis; the ordinary real ordering of eigenvalues above uses that hypothesis. If arbitrary chains are intended, define the spectral gap explicitly: the eigenvalue lower bound for total variation mixing works for complex eigenfunctions too, and proves the same assertion for or for , which is at least . No real ordering of complex eigenvalues is implicit.
For the requested counterexample take nonlazy simple random walk on the complete graph , . Let have every row equal to the uniform distribution on a finite set, and let . Then
Thus and : every fixed-level mixing time is eventually one. This is a bounded-time jump satisfying the ratio definition of cutoff. The ordinary spectral gap is and the absolute one is , so both products with tend to one, not infinity. The divergence assumption on is therefore essential under this convention.
Peres product condition 2026-10-06
For finite irreducible Markov chains that are aperiodic Markov chains and reversible Markov chains, the ratio definition of cutoff and imply the Peres product condition, with . If on a subsequence, then and the eigenvalue lower bound for total variation mixing give
For sufficiently small fixed , this contradicts the limit one forced by cutoff for Markov chains. The same argument proves the stronger conclusion .