Intersection polynomial Created 2026-10-05 Updated 2026-10-06
For a finite set and a finite list of allowed intersection sizes, the displayed polynomial satisfies at characteristic vectors of sets. For an -uniform set family whose pairwise intersection sizes lie in , these polynomials vanish at all other family members and have nonzero values at their own members. Their restrictions are therefore linearly independent. Multilinear reduction on the Boolean cube and homogenisation on a uniform layer then prove the Ray-Chaudhuri–Wilson theorem bound.
The Frankl-Wilson theorem is a striking example of the polynomial method in combinatorics: an intersection restriction creates a family of linearly independent low-degree polynomials, whose dimension bounds the set family. Let be a prime number, let have elements, and let be a set family such that member sizes modulo avoid while every distinct pair has intersection size in modulo . Its general modular form gives
If all members have the same size and , the uniform refinement gives .
For the proof, work over the finite field and associate to the modular intersection polynomial
At the characteristic vector of a set , this equals zero for and is nonzero for . A linear relation among the evaluation functions therefore has every coefficient zero. The multilinear reduction on the Boolean cube, replacing by for , preserves these evaluations and the degree bound . There are possible square-free monomials, proving the general form.
For uniform members, the low-degree evaluation rank on a uniform layer supplies the sharper dimension bound. To verify this without division modulo , form the integer incidence matrix with rows indexed by subsets of size at most , columns indexed by -subsets , and entries . Over the rational numbers, a row with is times the sum of all size- rows containing . Its matrix rank is at most . Every larger integer minor is consequently zero and remains zero modulo , giving the same bound over . The nonzero diagonal evaluation matrix of the then forces .
The theorem, proved by Frankl and Wilson in 1981, extends the theme of the Ray-Chaudhuri–Wilson theorem from ordinary intersection sizes to residues. Modular restrictions can be weaker than exact intersection restrictions yet still force unexpectedly small families. Here are three consequences from one explicit modular intersection graph.
Take , , and let the vertices be all -subsets of , with an edge exactly when the intersection has size . An independent set avoids the only possible off-diagonal intersection congruent to modulo , so applying the Frankl-Wilson theorem with gives
A clique has one exact intersection size. Apply the uniform theorem modulo a prime larger than , with , to get . Since there are vertices, this gives the explicit asymmetric Ramsey number bound . It illustrates how algebraic constructions produce graphs with simultaneously restricted cliques and independent sets.
For a geometric application, map each vertex to in . Then , so edges have unit Euclidean distance. Every proper colouring of Euclidean space therefore colours this finite graph, giving
The Stirling formula gives the ratio as , where is the binary entropy function in natural-log units. The positive constant proves an exponential chromatic number of Euclidean space lower bound along these dimensions.
Finally, a quadratic embedding converts this same forbidden intersection into a forbidden diameter pair. Set and . The quadratic sign-vector diameter formula follows from the Frobenius inner product:
For distinct members the smallest possible absolute inner product is one, attained exactly when the intersection is . Thus maximum-distance pairs are exactly edges of . The matrices have common diagonal; using their off-diagonal coordinates, multiplied by , realizes them isometrically in dimensions. They are distinct because equal outer products require , and complements have size , not .
Any subset of smaller diameter contains at most points, so a partition into smaller-diameter pieces needs at least pieces. For sufficiently large primes this exceeds , disproving the Borsuk conjecture. This is the mechanism behind the Kahn-Kalai counterexample to the Borsuk conjecture: the number of required pieces grows exponentially in the original set-system parameter while dimension grows quadratically. Their 1993 paper establishes the resulting high-dimensional counterexample.
Use the polynomial method in combinatorics to prove the Ray-Chaudhuri–Wilson theorem. For each define an intersection polynomial over ,
At the characteristic vector of a set , the inner sum is . Therefore
It follows that the restrictions of to the uniform layer of the Boolean cube
have linear independence: evaluating any vanishing linear combination at each forces its th coefficient to be zero.
Apply multilinear reduction on the Boolean cube by replacing each positive power in a monomial with . This preserves evaluations on and gives multilinear polynomials of polynomial degree at most . Counting all monomials of degrees up to would give only , which is too weak. Instead use homogenisation on a uniform layer.
Because has distinct integers in , we have . For with , write , with . On ,
Indeed, at both sides vanish if ; otherwise exactly summands equal . The denominator is positive since . Thus every monomial of degree at most , restricted to , lies in the span of the degree- monomials. This vector space consequently has dimension at most . The linear independence already proved now gives
No additional condition such as is needed: only the spanning upper bound is used, not independence of all degree- monomials. The argument also covers if empty is allowed, with the empty product equal to and at most one member in the set family.
The answer is . Partition all but at most one point into disjoint pairs and take all unions of two pairs. There are such four-sets, and two distinct unions intersect in zero or two points. The Ray-Chaudhuri–Wilson theorem gives the upper bound .
The answer is . All four-sets containing one fixed pair form a family of size
whose distinct intersections have size two or three. The Ray-Chaudhuri–Wilson theorem for the two allowed intersection sizes gives the matching upper bound.
The answer is . Take a Steiner triple system, or a partial one of quadratic size, on and adjoin the fixed point to every triple. Distinct triples meet in zero or one point, so the resulting four-sets meet in one or two points. This gives members. The Ray-Chaudhuri–Wilson theorem with the two allowed intersection sizes gives .