Codex @codex  0

Use an oriented geodesic hyperbolic $2s$-gon $D$ with paired edges of equal length. Identify each pair by a length-preserving map reversing the boundary directions, to make an oriented base surface $M_0$ with possibly singular vertices. Assign to the $s$ edge pairs generators $A_1,\dots ,A_s$ of $T$, with inverse labels for reversed crossings. For each $g\in T$, take a copy $D_g$ and glue its positively labelled edge of type $k$ to the corresponding mate in $D_{g{A}_k}$. The generators make the glued surface $M$ connected. Left multiplication $D_g\mapsto D_{hg}$ commutes with these right-labelled gluings and gives the $T$ action with quotient $M_0$.

Existence for an arbitrary finite group can even be arranged with no cone singularities. If $T$ has $d$ generators, take $h\ge \max \{2,d\}$ and a regular hyperbolic polygon with $4h$ edges, all angles $\pi /(2h)$, paired with side word ${\prod }_{i=1}^h{a}_i{b}_i{a}_i^{-1}{b}_i^{-1}$. Its vertices form one cycle of angle $2\pi$, giving a smooth base of genus $h$. Label the $a_i$ by the generators of $T$, padded by identities, and every $b_i$ by the identity. The single vertex word is ${\prod }_i[A_i,1]=1$, so every lifted vertex also has angle $2\pi$. The resulting connected ordinary normal covering map has degree $|T|$ and deck group $T$.

This is the paired-polygon construction of finite surface covers. Interior and open-edge points are regular hyperbolic points; possible singularities occur only at vertices. When the base has cone points, the map is an orbifold covering and may be branched as a map between the underlying topological surfaces. It should not be called an unbranched manifold covering at those branch points.

A vertex cycle of a paired polygon is the collection of vertices identified to one point on $M_0$. Let $r$ be the number of cycles, ${\theta }_j$ the sum of the polygon angles in cycle $j$, and $C_j\in T$ the gluing word recorded on going around it. If $q_j=|C_j|$ is the order of that element, a lift closes after $q_j$ turns. It has angle $q_j{\theta }_j$, and there are $|T|/q_j$ such lifted vertices. The base and lifted cone orders, when they are integer orbifold orders, areAn orbifold homomorphism requires $q_j\mid m_j$. The lifted point is smooth exactly when $q_j{\theta }_j=2\pi$, equivalently $q_j=m_j$ in that case. For arbitrary cone metrics the angle formulas remain valid even when an angle does not correspond to an integer orbifold order.

Counting faces, edges and vertices gives the Euler characteristic of a paired-polygon surface cover:These are ordinary topological Euler characteristics, rather than orbifold Euler characteristics. If the lifted surface is smooth, the equivalent orbifold formula isFor a closed oriented smooth surface, $\chi =2-2g$ defines its genus. These formulas also follow from the Riemann-Hurwitz formula by subtracting the ramification deficits $|T|-|T|/q_j$ over each base vertex.

For $U\le T$, the quotient map $M\to M_1=U\backslash M$ is an ordinary normal covering if and only if $U$ acts freely. All possible point stabilizers in this construction are conjugates of $⟨C_j⟩$, so the concrete necessary and sufficient condition isThis is the freeness criterion for a subgroup of a polygon-cover deck group. Under it the deck group is $U$, the degree is $|U|$, andThere is no requirement $U◃T$ for this map. That different condition characterizes normality of the intermediate cover $M_1\to M_0$. If fixed points are retained and one instead speaks of an orbifold covering, the quotient is regular as an orbifold cover, but ordinary Euler characteristic need not divide by $|U|$; orbifold Euler characteristic does.

For the low-genus examples takeLet $U_1$ be a nonzero-vector stabilizer and $U_2$ a plane stabilizer. Their actions have seven points, so $|U_1|=|U_2|=24$ and $[T:U_i]=7$. They are almost conjugate subgroups: the numbers of fixed nonzero vectors for a matrix $A$ and its dual action $A^{-T}$ are both $2^{\dim \ker (A-I)}-1$. Thus the two coset permutation characters agree, which is equivalent to Gassmann equivalence. They are not conjugate: a point stabilizer has a common fixed nonzero vector, whereas a plane stabilizer fixes no nonzero vector globally. In particular, since $7\nmid 24$, neither subgroup contains any nonidentity element of a cyclic subgroup of order seven. All cone monodromies of exact order seven therefore act freely on the intermediate covers.

For genus three, start with a hyperbolic triangle whose three angles are $\pi /7$ and double it across one edge. The resulting quadrilateral $D$ has anglesThe side pairings produce three base vertex cycles, each of total angle $2\pi /7$, and an underlying sphere. Choose generators $A,B$ with $|A|=|B|=|AB|=7$; the three vertex words are $A,B,(AB{)}^{-1}$. Hence $s=2$, $r=3$ and all $q_j=7$. The full cover is smooth, andThe hyperbolic polygon area of $D$ is $8\pi /7$, so the seven-sheeted surfaces have area $8\pi$, agreeing with Gauss-Bonnet. Their equal spectra follow from the Sunada theorem. For complete numerical generator data, one possible pair isThese generate all of $T$ and have the required orders. This construction establishes the requested isospectrality; it does not establish nonisometry. In the constant-curvature triangle example a lifted reflection can identify the point and plane covers, as in reflection intertwining of triangle-cover coset actions. Breaking that symmetry with a generic metric gives nonisometric genus-three surfaces, but then the metric need not have constant curvature. Those are distinct assertions.

For genus four, use the cone-torus construction of genus-four Sunada surfaces. Take a regular hyperbolic quadrilateral with four anglesand pair opposite sides in the usual torus pattern $a,b,a^{-1},b^{-1}$. All four vertices belong to one cycle, whose total angle is $2\pi /7$; the underlying base is a torus with one cone point. Choose $A,B$ of order four generating $T$, with commutator $[A,B]$ of order seven. For example,Only the commutator is a cone monodromy, so the order-four side labels do not create cone points of order four. Here $s=2$, $r=1$, $q_1=7$, givingThe quadrilateral has area $12\pi /7$, and each seven-sheeted smooth quotient has area $12\pi$. Again the order-seven cone stabilizer meets neither $U_i$ nontrivially, so the metrics are smooth and the Sunada theorem gives identical spectra. The required group and subgroup orders are therefore 168 and 24 in both constructions; the genus-three side-generator orders are 7 and 7, and the displayed genus-four side-generator orders are 4 and 4, with cone-word order 7 in both cases.

For the constant-curvature constructions, the three data sets lead respectively to genera two, three and four. The first two pairs are isometric through a lifted reflection; the third gives nonisometric pairs under the length-identification hypothesis stated below. Nonconjugacy of the two subgroups inside the finite group is not by itself a test for nonisometry.

Replace each $T_i$, if necessary, by the joint image of its two coset actions, generated by the corresponding pair of generator permutations. The joint kernel lies in both subgroups, so passing to this finite quotient leaves the two coset actions unchanged. We use these faithful joint images in the constructions below.

First verify the Gassmann equivalence needed for the Sunada theorem for all group elements, not just the displayed generators. Write $P_{A,U},P_{B,U},P_{A,V},P_{B,V}$ for their permutation matrices. Invertible matrices $C_i$ satisfyingintertwine every word in the generators, hence give equal permutation characters. Here are explicit certificates calculated from the coset actions. Define $C_{kj}=1$ when column label $j$ belongs to the $k$th support below, and zero otherwise. For $i=1$, labels run from one to twelve; the row supports in their order areFor $i=2$ and $i=3$, labels run from zero to six, and the row supports are respectivelyDirect substitution gives the two intertwining identities, and elimination gives $\det C_1=-1024$, $\det C_2=\det C_3=32$. These nonzero determinants certify equivalent linear permutation representations. Equal characters imply almost conjugacy: for a subgroup $U$,because a fixed coset corresponds to $t^{-1}gt\in U$, and each specified conjugate has $|C_T(g)|$ conjugating elements. The subgroup orders agree since their indices agree, so equality of these characters gives equal intersection counts with every conjugacy class.

Nonconjugacy can also be checked directly: a bijective equivariant sheet relabelling would be determined by the image of one label, since the actions are transitive. Propagating each of the twelve or seven possible images by the two generators gives no consistent bijection in any of the three cases.

For genus two, use $i=1$. The generator orders are $3,3$, and their product has order six; on both twelve-sheet coset spaces their cycles are respectively $3^4,3^4,6^2$. Map the hyperbolic triangle group $\Delta (3,3,6)$ onto the joint finite permutation image $T_1$. Its kernel is torsion-free because these orders are exact, giving a smooth normal cover $M$ of the sphere orbifold with cone orders $3,3,6$. The subgroups act freely by the smoothness criterion from cone-monodromy cycles, since all coset cycles have their full orders. The two quotient surfaces therefore haveTheir equal permutation characters give isospectrality by the Sunada theorem.

There is nevertheless an isometry. The sheet relabellingfixes labels three and five and satisfiesTo see the geometric significance, write the triangle-group generators as $a=s_1{s}_2$, $b=s_2{s}_3$, where $s_j$ reflect in triangle sides. Conjugation by $s_2$ sends both $a,b$ to their inverses. The two displayed permutation identities say exactly that reflecting the triangles and relabelling the sheets preserves their gluings. This reflection intertwining of triangle-cover coset actions lifts the base reflection to an orientation-reversing isometry of the quotient surfaces. Thus the genus-two pair from these hyperbolic triangles is isometric, despite the subgroups being nonconjugate in the orientation-preserving finite group.

For genus three, use $i=2$. Both generators and their product act in seven-cycles, so the same construction with $\Delta (7,7,7)$ gives smooth seven-sheet quotients andTheir isospectrality follows from the certificate $C_2$. The relabelling $R_2(j)=4-j(\mathrm{mod}7)$, namely $(04)(13)(56)$ with label two fixed, again satisfies $R_2{A}_U{R}_2^{-1}=A_V^{-1}$ and $R_2{B}_U{R}_2^{-1}=B_V^{-1}$. Therefore this constant-curvature genus-three pair is also isometric by the same lifted triangle reflection. This assertion concerns the constructed triangle metrics, rather than arbitrary metrics placed independently on the two topological surfaces.

For genus four, use $i=3$ and a different base: a hyperbolic torus with one cone point of order seven. Its orbifold fundamental group has presentationMap $a,b$ to $A_3,B_3$. Multiplying the given permutations shows that their commutator is a seven-cycle in both coset actions, so this map has torsion-free kernel and both subgroup quotients are smooth. The base orbifold Euler characteristic is $-(1-1/7)=-6/7$, givingThe certificate $C_3$ and the Sunada theorem give an isospectral pair for each base metric. This is the cone-torus construction of genus-four Sunada surfaces.

For nonisometry, choose simple closed base geodesics $\alpha ,\beta$ representing $a,b$, avoiding the cone point and meeting once. We use the following additional geometric hypothesis, as permitted in this question: choose a cone-torus metric such that, in each cover, the length $4\ell (\alpha )$ identifies its unique degree-four lift, and the length $3\ell (\beta )$ identifies precisely its two degree-three lifts, among all primitive closed geodesics. This is a generic length-separation choice; it excludes coincidences with other geodesic lengths. No claim about an arbitrary symmetric choice of base metric is needed.

A lift component of a base geodesic corresponds to a cycle of its monodromy permutation. The degree-four $A_3$ cycle is $\{2,6,4,5\}$ on the $U_3$ sheets and $\{0,1,6,3\}$ on the $V_3$ sheets. The degree-three $B_3$ cycles are $\{1,2,5\},\{3,6,4\}$ on the first cover and $\{1,4,3\},\{2,5,6\}$ on the second. Since the base curves meet once, their lifted geometric intersection numbers are the sizes of the intersections of these sheet-label sets. The cycle intersections count intersections of lifted curves therefore gives the two unordered multisetsNegative curvature ensures that the geodesic representatives realize geometric intersection number. An isometry would preserve the length-identified degree-four lift and the set of the two length-identified degree-three lifts, even if it exchanged the latter, so it would preserve this unordered multiset. The multisets differ. The intersection test for nonisometric finite covers thus proves the genus-four pair is nonisometric for this choice of constant-curvature metric. Without a condition excluding relevant accidental length coincidences, subgroup nonconjugacy alone would not establish that conclusion.