In Feynman gauge, use the auxiliary photon propagator and . The projected one-loop Feynman parameter integral isHere is the source's photon parameter .[ref]
QED Vertex Correction (Vadim Kaplunovsky course notes). Eqs. (32), (35), (40), (68)
To check the reduction, use and . The three-parameter expression has prefactor multiplying . At fixed , , giving . Substituting gives exactly the displayed integral. This starts from the projected QED numerator; it is not a derivation of the whole QED calculation from an arbitrarily chosen integral.
The regulator can then be removed by a short independent argument. Write its integrand as . For , , andThe dominated convergence theorem therefore gives and . At the regulated integrand is zero, whereas the limiting function can be assigned value ; one point has zero measure and changes no integral. For every , , and decreasing increases the integral. The visible suppression near narrows as the regulator shrinks; it is not a uniform pointwise approximation at that endpoint.
A finite magnetic coefficient survives removal of the regulator
. Original numerical evaluation of the reduced one-loop Feynman parameter integral, with . The left panel shows suppression near the endpoint; the right panel plots against the auxiliary mass ratio. The dashed limit is the exact integral . Finite values illustrate regularization in quantum field theory, not alternative measured photon masses. Details.This auxiliary mass regulates an infrared divergence, not an ultraviolet divergence; the finite-mass prescription alone is not fully gauge-invariant.[ref]
QED Vertex Correction (Vadim Kaplunovsky course notes). p. 15, Eqs. (65)–(68)
The ultraviolet problem belongs to the full QED amplitude. Electron self-energy, wave-function renormalization and the charge vertex require consistent counterterms and renormalization conditions. The Ward identity for QED renormalization constants ties to , rather than allowing the vertex and external Electron normalization to be fitted independently. Minimal renormalizable QED has no independent Pauli term to adjust this finite one-loop : its dimension-five coefficient is predicted from the mass and electric charge inputs. Adding a free Pauli term would define a different theory with an extra parameter. Finiteness of the reduced integral alone proves neither all-order renormalizability nor finiteness of every QED observable.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.
