Let be the unrepressed steady state, , , and . The logic approximation for gene regulation gives the repressilator equationsAn active production term makes its concentration approach one exponentially; an inactive term makes it decay exponentially. Oscillations require an accessible threshold, . Equal thresholds and rate constants alone do not specify a numerical period.
Initially , so , , until reaches at . Then production stops and . It reaches after another , allowing production. When rises through , production stops. As falls through , production resumes; its next upward crossing represses . The downward crossing of then restarts . This ordered sequence repeats, giving displaced pulses and rounded exponential rises and falls.
Every event can be constructed without a numerical differential-equation solver: a rising variable starting at takes to reach , while a decaying variable starting at takes . Advance all three variables with their current production terms to the earliest such event, switch the affected production term, and continue. The original plot uses the explicitly illustrative choice . If , the unrepressed levels cannot cross the threshold and this oscillatory sequence does not follow.
Original logic approximation for gene regulation trajectory of the repressilator, with threshold one half of the unrepressed level
. Details. Write , , , and . The repressilator in the stated logic approximation isAssume . Initially low Z allows X production; high Y blocks Z; and Y is initially at its unrepressed steady level. X first rises through at , turning Y production off. Y then decays through at , where , allowing Z to rise. Z reaches at and switches X production off. At this point , so X falls through at and releases Y production.
Y's rise then switches Z off, Z's fall releases X again, and the sequence repeats. Every segment is exponential relaxation towards one if its production gate is on, or towards zero if off. For a rising segment starting at , the next threshold time is ; for a falling segment starting at , it is . These rules determine the whole trace without pretending the concentrations are square waves. X, Z and Y peak in sequence after the stated initial condition; the last panel of the figure in solution gives an illustrative trajectory.
The delayed sequence of three inhibitory links supplies negative feedback with finite response times. Equal rates make the cycling symmetric after the initial transient, not simultaneous. If , repression is never reliably engaged and the proteins approach their unrepressed levels instead; oscillation is not implied for arbitrary thresholds or for every smooth regulatory law replacing the ideal relay.
A fluorescent reporter associated with one phase of the repressilator should show repeated rises and falls in a tracked cell, with the same underlying oscillatory period but generally delayed and smoothed relative to instantaneous promoter activity. If mature GFP is fused to a repressor and is sufficiently fast to mature, fluorescence approximately tracks that protein's abundance. If GFP is a separately expressed reporter, its own production, maturation, degradation and dilution introduce an additional filter.
For example, converts a periodic gate into a periodic, phase-lagged concentration. Very stable GFP can accumulate a large baseline and obscure oscillations rather than reproducing the regulator trace exactly; maturation delay and bleaching also matter. Biological noise and cell-to-cell phase differences can make individual cycles irregular and wash out oscillations in a population average. The appropriate sketch is therefore a delayed, rounded oscillatory fluorescence trace, with amplitude and baseline depending on reporter turnover, rather than an unqualified copy of a Boolean gate.
