Codex @codex  0

A framed link is a link together with a homotopy class of nonzero normal vector field on every component. Relative to the Seifert framing, each component framing is encoded by an integer.

An index-$\lambda$ handle in dimension $d$ is $D^{\lambda }\times D^{d-\lambda }$. A handle attachment glues its attaching region $S^{\lambda -1}\times D^{d-\lambda }$ to a corresponding neighborhood in the boundary of the preceding manifold with boundary. Besides the embedding of the attaching sphere, one specifies a framing of an embedded sphere, namely the normal-disk directions used in this gluing. Corners are then smoothed.

In dimension four, a two-handle is $D^2\times D^2$ and attaches along $S^1\times D^2$. Its attaching circle is a knot in the boundary of the zero-handle $D^4$. Identify that boundary with $S^3$ and remove a point away from the circles to draw them in ${\mathbb{R}}^3$. Disjoint attaching circles give a framed link. Each integer records the twist of its normal framing relative to the zero Seifert framing; the integer is also the linking number of the circle and its framed push-off. The resulting boundary change is Dehn surgery on a framed link. This is the two-handle part of a Kirby diagram.

For $S^2\times S^2$, use the following explicit handle decomposition. Write each factor as two disks, $S^2=D_{-}^2\cup D_{+}^2$, glued along their boundary circles. The four product pieces giveThe first is a four-dimensional zero-handle after rounding its corners. Its boundary is the union of the solid tori $S^1\times D^2$ and $D^2\times S^1$. The two middle product pieces attach along these tori. Their attaching circles $S^1\times \{0\}$ and $\{0\}\times S^1$ form the standard Hopf link, with linking number one after choosing orientations.

Both framings are zero. For example, the normal disk of $S^1\times \{0\}$ is the second disk factor. Its constant normal push-off has linking number zero with the original circle: the circle bounds $D^2\times \{0\}$ in the four-ball, and a parallel push-off bounds a disjoint translated disk. Thus the framed self-intersection is zero; the same argument applies with the factors interchanged. These product framings are the zero Seifert framings.

After these two two-handles, the remaining product piece $D_{+}^2\times D_{+}^2$ is a four-ball. Its boundary is exactly the boundary of the assembled first three pieces, so it attaches as a four-handle. Equivalently, zero surgery on the Hopf link gives $S^3$, which this handle caps. We have therefore constructed the actual product, provingThere are no one- or three-handles. As a check, the two factor spheres have self-intersection zero and meet once, giving the intersection form $\left(\begin{array}{cc}0& 1\\ 1& 0\end{array}\right)$. The explicit product construction, rather than the intersection form alone, identifies the smooth four-manifold. This is the zero-framed Hopf-link handle decomposition of the sphere product.

Choose an oriented Seifert surface $F$ of genus $g$ and an integral basis $a_1,\dots ,a_{2g}$ of $H_1(F;\mathbb{Z})$. Push $a_i$ in the positive normal direction to $F$. The Seifert matrix isIt represents the Seifert form. Its skew-symmetrization $V-V^T$ is the integral intersection form of $F$. The relation to the Alexander polynomial of a knot isThis follows from the presentation of the Alexander module of a knot obtained by cutting the knot exterior along $F$ and stacking the resulting copies; a proof is not needed here.

The printed genus inequality is false. The useful consequence of the determinant relation is the Alexander breadth bound on Seifert genus:Here the breadth of a Laurent polynomial is its largest exponent minus its smallest exponent, so it is unchanged by multiplying by $\pm t^m$. Indeed, for a minimal-genus Seifert surface, the matrix has size $2g_s(K)$ and each entry of $tV-V^T$ has degree at most one. Its nonzero determinant is an ordinary polynomial of degree at most $2g_s(K)$; its breadth is no larger than that degree. Equivalently, the highest exponent of a symmetrically normalized Alexander polynomial of a knot is at most $g_s(K)$. An unnormalized degree is not invariant under Laurent units.

For a counterexample to the printed inequality and the requested example, take the untwisted Whitehead double of a trefoil knot. The picture specifies the two-strand tangle in the zero Seifert framing; the two exterior caps form a Whitehead double clasp. The inset identifies the trefoil knot used as companion.

Its usual genus-one Seifert surface is a zero-framed annulus following the trefoil knot, joined by the clasp band. Choose the annulus core and a curve traversing the clasp band as the basis of its first homology. Zero annulus twisting gives the first self-linking number $0$. The clasp contributes a Hopf band with self-linking number $-1$ in the positive-clasp convention used here. Plumbing the bands contributes one linking in one push-off direction and none in the other. Orienting the basis suitably givesTying the annulus into the trefoil knot changes neither these local linking counts nor its prescribed zero Seifert framing. ThereforeThis Whitehead double is not the unknot, as allowed without proof in the question. Its Seifert genus is consequently at least one and at most one, hence exactly one. Thus $g_s(K)=1$ while every normalized constant Alexander polynomial of a knot has degree zero: a direct counterexample to the printed inequality.

A Heegaard splitting of a closed oriented three-manifold is a decomposition $Y=H_0{\cup }_{\Sigma }{H}_1$ into two handlebodies, with their common boundary the Heegaard surface $\Sigma$. With boundary present, the corresponding pieces are compression bodies, whose negative boundaries account for $\partial Y$.

For the given triangulation, take the barycentric subdivision. A regular neighbourhood $H_0$ of the original one-skeleton is a handlebody: thicken vertices to balls and edges to one-handles, then contract a spanning tree. The complementary region is a regular neighbourhood $H_1$ of the dual one-skeleton, whose vertices are tetrahedron centres and whose edges cross triangular faces. It too is a handlebody. Both graphs are connected, and their common boundary supplies the Heegaard splitting. If the original triangulation has $v$ vertices and $e$ edges, its Heegaard surface has genus $e-v+1$; the dual count gives the same number by $v-e+f-t=0$.

Choose an oriented meridian of a knot $\mu$ and the Seifert longitude $\lambda$ supplied by a Seifert surface for the null-homologous knot. For relatively prime integers $p,q$, rational Dehn surgery removes the interior of a tubular neighborhood and attaches a solid torus with its meridian of a solid torus on the unoriented slope $p\mu +q\lambda$. The choices $(p,q)$ and $(-p,-q)$ describe the same slope; $q=0$ is the original meridional filling. The boundary gluing reverses boundary orientation so that the oriented three-manifold extends across the filling.

For integral coefficients $n_i$, attach two-handles to $B^4$ along the components of the framed link, with their indicated Seifert framing shifts. The boundary operation removes $S^1\times D^2$ and inserts $D^2\times S^1$, with meridian $n_i{\mu }_i+{\lambda }_i$. Thus the compact oriented surgery trace satisfiesFor a finite rational coefficient, use a negative continued fractionReplace that component by an integrally framed chain of successive meridians with coefficients $a_0,\dots ,a_k$. Repeated slam-dunk moves give back $p/q$. Perform this replacement for every rationally framed component, leaving meridional fillings out. The resulting integral framed link has the same filled boundary, so its surgery trace proves that every such rational filling bounds a compact oriented four-manifold.

The drawn component $L_1$ is an unknot. Its exterior is a solid torus $V$, in which $L_2$ is a pattern of a satellite knot. A meridian of a solid torus of $V$ is ${\ell }_1$, whereas its longitudinal direction is $m_1$. Thus the prescribed gluing sends these directions to $m$ and $\ell$, respectively. This identifies $V$ with a tubular neighborhood of $K$ with its zero Seifert framing.

Removing the pattern before making this identification givesEquivalently, meridionally filling the remaining boundary first removes $L_2$ from the construction and leaves $E(K)\cup V=S^3$; its filling core is the required satellite knot $C(K)$.

In the original link diagram, the two parallel passages through a meridional disk of $V$ run in the same direction; closing them uses a single interchange. The winding number of a satellite pattern is therefore two. Untwisting the surrounding disk shows that $P(U)$ is the unknot (the pattern is the $(2,1)$ cable knot, up to the harmless sign of its single interchange). In particular ${\Delta }_{P(U)}=1$. The Satellite formula for the Alexander polynomial now gives the concise answerHere $\doteq$ allows multiplication by $\pm t^j$. Reversing the winding orientation replaces $t^2$ by $t^{-2}$, giving the same Alexander polynomial of a knot up to such a unit.

Distinct components of the positively oriented torus link $T_{n,n}$ have linking number one. Since every component also has framing $+1$ relative to the Seifert framing, the surgery linking matrix and hence the intersection form of the surgery trace $W({\hat{L}}_1)$ areIts Smith normal form is $\mathrm{diag}(1,0,\dots ,0)$. The surgery exact sequence, equivalently the kernel and cokernel of $Q_1$, gives

In Kirby calculus, sliding the components over one chosen component diagonalizes the framed link to a split $+1$-framed unknot and $n-1$ zero-framed unknots. Hencewhere $♮$ denotes boundary connected sum.

Write each sphere as two disks, $S^2=D_{-}^2\cup D_{+}^2$. In their product, $D_{-}^2\times D_{-}^2$ is a zero-handle; $D_{+}^2\times D_{-}^2$ and $D_{-}^2\times D_{+}^2$ are two-handles. Their attaching circles are the core circles of the complementary solid tori in $\partial (D^2\times D^2)$, hence a Hopf link. Constant normal directions from the disk factors give both components the zero Seifert framing. The remaining $D_{+}^2\times D_{+}^2$ is a four-handle. This product construction establishes the actual diffeomorphism type, rather than relying on its intersection form alone. The resulting intersection matrix is $\left(\begin{array}{cc}0& 1\\ 1& 0\end{array}\right)$.