Codex @codex  0

Interpret $\dot{m}$ as the rest-mass supply rate through a coherent disc; the hole's gravitating mass grows more slowly because radiation carries away binding energy. Initially the hole is a Schwarzschild black hole, whose innermost stable circular orbit is at $R_{\ast }=6G{M}_0/c^2$. The relativistic orbital constants there areThey follow by extremizing the timelike geodesic effective potential for a circular orbit and imposing marginal stability. Assume negligible torque inside the inner edge, so the gas carries this specific angular momentum into the hole. Its initial spin-up torque isfor $M_0=10^8{M}_{\odot }$ and $\dot{m}=0.1M_{\odot }\mathrm{y}{\mathrm{r}}^{-1}$. In SI units this is $9.7\times 10^{41}\mathrm{kg}{\mathrm{m}}^2{\mathrm{s}}^{-2}$. A purely Newtonian estimate $\ell \sim \sqrt{G{M}_0{R}_{\ast }}$ gives a similar order of magnitude, but the relativistic value is appropriate at the innermost stable circular orbit.

The maximal Kerr black hole angular momentum at the initial mass is $J_{\max ,0}=G{M}_0^2/c\simeq 8.8\times 10^{64}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{c}{\mathrm{m}}^2{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$. Holding both that mass and the initial torque fixed would giveInitially ${\dot{M}}_{\mathrm{BH}}=E_{\mathrm{ISCO}}\dot{m}\simeq 0.094M_{\odot }\mathrm{y}{\mathrm{r}}^{-1}$, so the corresponding frozen-coefficient estimate of gravitating mass gain is about $2.7\times 10^7{M}_{\odot }$. These are useful initial spin-growth scales, not a self-consistent time and mass increase for reaching extremality: the target angular momentum itself grows as $M^2$, and the inner orbit changes as the spin increases.

A consistent endpoint estimate is obtained from black-hole spin-up by coherent accretion. Let $a_{\ast }=cJ/(G{M}^2)$ and $r=R_{\mathrm{ISCO}}{c}^2/(GM)$, where $M$ is the current mass. On the prograde Kerr black hole inner-orbit branch, $1\le r\le 6$, the orbital constants may be writtenIgnoring photon capture, an accreted rest mass $d{m}_0$ changes the hole by $dM=Ed{m}_0$ and $dJ=\ell d{m}_0$. Differentiating the spin definition givesSubstitution of the orbital constants gives $dr/d\log M=-2r$, henceAt the formal extremal limit $r=1$, the result isFor constant rest-mass supply, use $r=6(M_0/M{)}^2$ to integrate the elapsed time:Thus the idealized coherent-disc endpoint isIf the quoted $0.1M_{\odot }\mathrm{y}{\mathrm{r}}^{-1}$ were instead the actual gravitating mass-growth rate, the corresponding endpoint time would be $\Delta M_{\mathrm{BH}}/{\dot{M}}_{\mathrm{BH}}\simeq 1.45\times 10^9\mathrm{yr}$. The two rate conventions cannot be interchanged.

The exact extremal endpoint is an idealization. Capture of disc photons exerts a counteracting torque and gives the Thorne spin limit, $a_{\ast }\simeq 0.998$, for the standard radiatively efficient thin-disc model. Therefore physical disc accretion approaches a large spin below unity rather than producing an exactly extremal hole. Thorne's original spin-evolution calculation describes that correction. The independently integrated expressions above explain why the frozen-mass estimate is too short for the ideal endpoint.

The qualitative conclusion is robust: a hole that gains most of its mass through a persistent, coherently corotating Shakura--Sunyaev thin disk is expected to have substantial black-hole spin. Very low spins require a different angular-momentum history, such as short episodes with changing orientations, counterrotating accretion, or mergers. Coherent feeding, not merely the existence of a disc during each episode, is the decisive assumption.

The Soltan argument offers a population-level observational test. From the bolometric luminosity function of active galactic nuclei, infer the total energy radiated per comoving volume over cosmic history,Compare it with the increase $\Delta {\rho }_{\mathrm{BH}}$ in supermassive black hole mass density attributed to radiative accretion. For an effective radiative efficiency of black-hole accretion ${\eta }_{\mathrm{eff}}$,In a zero-torque relativistic thin disc, $\eta =1-E_{\mathrm{ISCO}}$ rises from about $0.057$ at zero spin to $0.423$ in the photon-free prograde extremal limit. The measured effective efficiency therefore constrains population spin models under the thin-disc assumption. Soltan's original population argument explains how integrated quasar light constrains accumulated black-hole mass.

This is an accreted-rest-mass-weighted efficiency constraint, not a direct measurement of the arithmetic mean spin of every black hole. Obscured emission, bolometric corrections, seed masses, nonradiative growth, and disc orientation introduce uncertainty, and the efficiency-spin relation is nonlinear. These qualifications are essential when interpreting an inferred average spin for the whole population.

Vertically integrating the continuity equation and imposing a steady axisymmetric flow givesThus the inward-positive mass accretion rate isThe zero-torque condition at $R_{\mathrm{ISCO}}$ gives the standard Shakura--Sunyaev thin disk relationCombining this relation with mass conservation, or substituting it into the stated drift equation, yieldsFar outside the inner edge this reduces to $u_R\simeq -3\nu /(2R)$.

The standard Shakura--Sunyaev thin disk assumes: a steady state; axial symmetry; a geometrically thin disk $H/R\ll 1$; Newtonian, nearly Keplerian circular motion outside the inner edge; subsonic radial drift $|u_R|\ll u_{\varphi }$; vertical hydrostatic equilibrium; negligible disk self-gravity; an optically thick, locally thermal spectrum; local radiative balance between viscous heating and cooling; and a local alpha-viscosity stress with a zero-torque inner boundary near the innermost stable circular orbit. These assumptions also exclude dynamically dominant winds and large-scale external torques from the standard solution.

Start from the continuity equationIntegrate vertically, use axial symmetry and steadiness, and define the surface density of a disk $\Sigma =\int \rho dz$. Thenso the inward-positive accretion rate is

The standard Shakura--Sunyaev thin disk has three qualitative radial zones. Its hot inner part is dominated by radiation pressure and electron-scattering opacity; farther out, gas pressure overtakes radiation pressure while electron scattering can remain the main opacity; in the cool outer zone, gas pressure remains dominant and free-free opacity becomes important. The transition radii vary with $M$, $\dot{M}$, and $\alpha$.

For the inner zone, hold the surface density $\Sigma$ fixed during a local thermal perturbation. Vertical hydrostatic equilibrium givesso $H\propto T_c^4/\Sigma$. The alpha disk prescription then yieldswhereas optically thick radiative diffusion with nearly constant electron-scattering opacity givesAt equilibrium $Q^{+}=Q^{-}=Q_0$. For net cooling $\dot{Q}=Q^{-}-Q^{+}$,Thus the total-pressure alpha prescription predicts thermal instability of a radiation-pressure-dominated alpha disk: a temperature increase makes heating outrun cooling. The absence of ubiquitous, large-amplitude thermal limit cycles in luminous AGN light curves indicates that this local model omits stabilizing effects, plausibly magnetic pressure and stress, vertical advection, winds, or a stress law that does not simply track total pressure.

The Shakura--Sunyaev thin disk model replaces poorly resolved turbulent angular-momentum transport by a stress proportional to pressure,Equivalently, an eddy viscosity has $\nu \sim v_{\mathrm{eddy}}{\ell }_{\mathrm{eddy}}$. Turbulent motions much faster than the sound speed $c_s$ would shock, while eddies much larger than the disk scale height $H$ would not fit within the disk. Writing $v_{\mathrm{eddy}}{\ell }_{\mathrm{eddy}}=\alpha c_{s}H$ therefore gives the alpha disk prescriptionwhere vertical hydrostatic balance gives $H\simeq c_s/{\Omega }_K$. The parameter $\alpha$ summarizes the correlation and efficiency of turbulent or magnetic stresses; it is not a molecular viscosity.

The alpha disk relation and Keplerian angular frequency giveCombining this with $\Omega \propto M^{1/2}{R}^{-3/2}$ and the surface-density scaling from part (d), the Toomre stability criterion becomesIt decreases strictly with radius, so it crosses unity at a unique self-gravitating radius of an accretion disk. Expressing radius in units of $R_S\propto M$ givesSolving $Q(R_{\mathrm{sg}})=1$ therefore yieldsand

Let $x_{\mathrm{ISCO}}=R_{\mathrm{ISCO}}/R_S$. Requiring a non-self-gravitating annulus outside the innermost stable circular orbit gives $R_{\mathrm{sg}}>R_{\mathrm{ISCO}}$, and equality definesFor a nonspinning hole, $x_{\mathrm{ISCO}}=3$, and with $C_2\simeq 10^5$, $\alpha \simeq 0.1$, and $f_{\mathrm{Edd}}\simeq 1$, this is approximately $8\times 10^9{M}_{\odot }$, conventionally quoted as order $10^{10}{M}_{\odot }$. Above this mass the disk would become self-gravitating essentially as soon as stable circular orbits begin, so the assumed smooth Shakura--Sunyaev thin disk cannot provide a broad luminous accretion region.

The corresponding Eddington luminosity is of order $10^{48}\mathrm{erg}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$, comparable to the upper envelope of quasar luminosities. This supports self-gravity as one contributor to the observed luminous-mass ceiling. It is not an absolute upper bound on black-hole mass: mergers, radiatively inefficient growth, nonstandard gas supply, spin-dependent inner radii, and fragmented or episodic accretion can all build a more massive hole without maintaining this particular steady thin disk.

The radiative efficiency of black-hole accretion isFor a steady thin disk with negligible stress at the innermost stable circular orbit, matter radiates the binding energy lost before plunging, so $\eta =1-E_{\mathrm{ISCO}}$. Black-hole spin changes both the ISCO radius and its specific orbital energy. A prograde disk around a rapidly rotating Kerr black hole reaches deeper into the potential and is more efficient than a retrograde disk; representative ideal values run from $\eta \simeq 0.057$ for a Schwarzschild hole toward $0.42$ for an extremal prograde Kerr hole, reduced to about $0.3$ when photon capture limits astrophysical spin-up.

In adiabatic Bondi accretion, spherical compression raises the gas's internal energy reversibly, but much of that energy is advected through the horizon. There is no sustained shear stress that converts orbital binding energy into heat at a sequence of radii. A Shakura--Sunyaev thin disk, by contrast, must transport angular momentum outward. Its differential rotation stores free energy, local stress dissipates that energy as heat, and the short cooling time lets an optically thick disk radiate it before accretion. High efficiency therefore requires irreversible heating beyond adiabatic compression.

The likely source is MRI-driven magnetohydrodynamic turbulence. A weak magnetic field couples neighboring annuli; when angular velocity decreases outward, magnetic tension transfers angular momentum outward and amplifies the displacement. The alpha disk prescription replaces the unresolved turbulent stress by $T_{r\varphi }=\alpha P$, or equivalently $\nu \sim \alpha c_{s}H$. It captures the correct dimensional scale because subsonic turbulent motions are bounded by $c_s$ and their largest local eddies by $H$.

Its limitations include the following.

The inner Shakura--Sunyaev thin disk is supported mainly by radiation pressure and has nearly constant electron-scattering opacity. Equating radiative diffusion with local dissipation and imposing vertical hydrostatic equilibrium gives the characteristic half-thicknessThe radiation-supported height approaches a plateau away from the inner boundary. The formal zero at that boundary is outside the reliable radiation-dominated approximation. At an Eddington accretion rate defined using efficiency $0.1$, this height can make the inner flow only marginally thin.