Codex @codex  0

For a pair $A\subseteq X$, the short exact sequence of chain complexes $0\to C_{\ast }(A)\to C_{\ast }(X)\to C_{\ast }(X,A)\to 0$ induces

Use integral homology throughout. The singular chain group $C_k(X)$ is free on the continuous maps from the standard $k$-simplex to $X$. Since the boundary operator preserves chains lying in $A$, these form a chain subcomplex. The relative chain complex and its relative homology areThe short exact sequence of chain complexes gives the long exact sequence in relative homology.

A sufficient hypothesis for the quotient comparison is a nonempty good pair: $A$ is closed and has an open neighbourhood $U$ which admits a deformation retraction onto $A$ while fixing $A$ throughout. A CW pair is another standard sufficient setting. These hypotheses hold for a simple closed curve in the surface here, using its annular collar neighbourhood. The induced quotient map $q:X\to Y=X/A$ collapses $A$ to a point $a$.

Here is the proof of the collapsing a pair theorem. Put $V=U/A\subset Y$. The deformation retraction makes $H_{\ast }(U,A)=0$, so the long exact sequence of the triple gives $H_{\ast }(X,A)\cong H_{\ast }(X,U)$. It also contracts $V$ onto $a$, giving $H_{\ast }(Y,\{a\})\cong H_{\ast }(Y,V)$. Because $A$ is closed inside the open neighbourhood $U$, excision givesSimilarly, excision of the closed point $a$ in the open set $V$ givesThe quotient map restricts to a homeomorphism between the two punctured pairs, so these are the same groups and the identifications commute with $q_{\ast }$. Finally $H_{\ast }(Y,\{a\})\cong {\tilde{H}}_{\ast }(Y)$, including degree zero. ThusThe neighbourhood condition is part of the result; the quotient assertion is not made for arbitrary bad pairs.

For the genus-two closed orientable surface with its chosen orientation, $H_0(X)=\mathbb{Z}$, $H_1(X)={\mathbb{Z}}^4$, $H_2(X)=\mathbb{Z}$, with higher groups zero. The curve has $H_0(A)=H_1(A)=\mathbb{Z}$. Its relevant long exact sequence in relative homology isThe final map is an isomorphism because both spaces are connected. Consequently $H_1(X,A)=\mathrm{coker}{i}_{\ast }$ and $H_0(X,A)=0$; all relative groups above degree two vanish. The quotient topological space is connected, so its unreduced $H_0$ is $\mathbb{Z}$.

In the separating case, the curve is the oriented boundary of one of the two subsurfaces. Its homology class in $X$ is therefore zero, so $i_{\ast }=0$. The exact sequence becomesThe first sequence splits since its quotient is a free abelian group. Hence the homology after collapsing a separating surface curve isGeometrically, collapsing the boundary of each once-punctured torus fills its puncture with a cone on the circle, which is a disk. The quotient is a wedge sum of two tori at the collapsed point. Their two independent fundamental classes explain the extra second-homology generator.

In the nonseparating case, join the two new boundary components of the cut surface by an arc. Upon regluing, this supplies a closed curve meeting $A$ once transversely. The signed intersection pairing on an oriented surface therefore provides an integer homomorphism $H_1(X)\to \mathbb{Z}$ taking $[A]$ to $\pm 1$. Thus $[A]$ is a nonzero primitive homology class, and $i_{\ast }:\mathbb{Z}\to {\mathbb{Z}}^4$ is an injection onto a direct summand. Its kernel is zero and its cokernel is ${\mathbb{Z}}^3$. The same exact sequence gives $H_2(X,A)\cong H_2(X)\cong \mathbb{Z}$. Therefore the homology after collapsing a nonseparating surface curve isAnother description starts from the genus-one surface with two boundary circles. Collapse those two circles separately to obtain a closed torus with two marked points, then identify the two points. Identifying two distinct points in a connected CW complex adds a loop up to homotopy, so this quotient has the homotopy type of $T^2\vee S^1$. The preceding relative homology calculation proves the groups without requiring that homotopy description.

First check the signs directly. For $(x,y)\in M_i$, applying the proposed differential twice givesbecause $f$ is a chain map. Thus $M$ is a chain complex.

Let $C^{\prime }$ be the shifted chain complex with $C_i^{\prime }=C_{i-1}$ and differential $d_C$; here there is no minus sign in that differential. Inclusion in the second summand and projection onto the first give a short exact sequence of chain complexesTo compute the connecting map in its long exact sequence in homology, lift a cycle $x\in C_{i-1}$ to $(x,0)\in M_i$. Its boundary is $(0,(-1{)}^{i}f(x))$. Hence the connecting map $H_i(C^{\prime })\to H_{i-1}(D)$ is $(-1{)}^i{f}_{\ast }$, and the relevant exact portion isIf every $f_{\ast }$ is an isomorphism, exactness makes $H_i(M)=0$. Conversely, if every $H_i(M)$ is zero, the adjacent exact portions make every $f_{\ast }$ both injective and surjective. ThereforeThis is the acyclicity criterion for a mapping cone, with the degree-dependent signs adjusted to the given convention.

For the assertion about spaces, use the cellular approximation theorem to replace $f$ by a cellular map, and take the induced map of the finite free cellular chain complexes. Tensoring these complexes and their cone with ${\mathbb{F}}_p$ gives the corresponding mod-$p$ complexes and cone. The same exact-sequence argument works over ${\mathbb{F}}_p$, so the assumed homology isomorphisms implyThe universal coefficient theorem for homology givesIn particular $H_i(M)\otimes {\mathbb{F}}_p=0$ for every prime. Each $H_i(M)$ is a finitely generated abelian group. A nonzero free summand would survive tensoring with every ${\mathbb{F}}_p$, while a nonzero finite cyclic summand would survive for a prime dividing its order. Thus $H_i(M)=0$ in every degree, by detection of integral acyclicity modulo primes. Applying the cone criterion once more proves the integral homology map is an isomorphism in every degree. Finite generation is what makes detection by all prime fields sufficient.

Inclusion and passage to the quotient give a short exact sequence of chain complexesDefine the connecting homomorphism as follows. If $[c]\in H_k(K,L)$, then $\bar{\partial }[c]=0$, so $\partial c\in C_{k-1}(L)$. Since ${\partial }^{2}c=0$, it is a chain cycle in $L$, and we setChanging $c$ by a relative boundary or a chain in $L$ changes $\partial c$ by a boundary in $L$, so $\delta$ is well defined.

The resulting sequence isWe verify exactness directly. If a cycle of $K$ maps to zero in the relative homology, it differs from a boundary by a cycle in $L$, so it lies in $\mathrm{im}{i}_{\ast }$. If a relative cycle $[c]$ satisfies $\delta [c]=0$, then $\partial c=\partial \ell$ for some $\ell \in C_k(L)$; hence $c-\ell$ is a cycle in $K$ mapping to $[c]$. Finally, if a cycle $z\in C_{k-1}(L)$ becomes a boundary in $K$, say $z=\partial c$, then $[c]$ is a relative cycle with $\delta [c]=[z]$. The reverse containments follow immediately from consecutive composites being zero. This proves the long exact sequence in relative homology.

Let $f:(C,d)\to (C^{\prime },d^{\prime })$ be a chain map, soIf $x\in C_i$ is a cycle, then $d^{\prime }{f}_i(x)=f_{i-1}d(x)=0$, so $f_i(x)$ is a cycle. If $x=d_{i+1}y$ is a boundary, thenis a boundary. Henceis a well-defined induced map on homology.

The maps $f$ and $g$ are chain homotopic if there are homomorphismssuch thatFor a cycle $x$, this giveswhich is a boundary. Thus $f_{\ast }[x]=g_{\ast }[x]$ and $f_{\ast }=g_{\ast }$ on homology.

Now consider the proposed mapping cone $M(f)$. Applying its differential twice givesThe diagonal entries vanish because $C$ and $C^{\prime }$ are chain complexes, and the lower-left entry isby the chain-map identity. Therefore $d_f^2=0$ and $M(f)$ is a chain complex.

There is a short exact sequence of chain complexeswhereIts long exact sequence in homology isTo identify the connecting map, represent a class in $H_{i-1}(C)$ by a cycle $x$ and lift it to $(x,0)\in M(f{)}_i$. ThensoAt the preceding occurrence the degree is $i+1$, giving $(-1{)}^{i+1}{f}_{\ast }$. Hence the sequence is exactly

Finally suppose $f-g=d^{\prime }h+hd$. DefineA direct calculation givesThese are equal precisely because $f-g=d^{\prime }h+hd$. Thus $\Phi$ is a chain map. Replacing the plus sign in its definition by a minus sign gives its inverse, so $M(f)$ and $M(g)$ are isomorphic as chain complexes.