Here , , and the upward step is either a birth or immigration, the latter having conditional probability . At zero immigration occurs with probability one. Put , and . The stationary weights of a reflected birth-death chain are
Their successive ratio tends to , so they are summable for . For , makes the weights strictly increasing, ruling out a stationary distribution. Thus positive recurrence holds exactly for . In that case the binomial series gives , and
Every step reverses parity and a two-step return has positive probability, so the period of a state in a Markov chain is two. Starting at zero, , whereas .
We use the stationary weights of a reflected birth-death chain, also verifying why they decide the question. If a stationary distribution exists, its equation at zero is . At , stationarity gives
Thus the edge flow is constant, and its value at the boundary is zero. Every stationary distribution must therefore satisfy detailed balance on each edge. Since irreducibility forces , it must be proportional to
Conversely, if , normalizing these positive weights gives a probability distribution satisfying detailed balance, hence a stationary distribution. Existence of a stationary distribution for an irreducible Markov chain on a countable state space is equivalent to positive recurrence.
The ratio is
For , the limit is less than one, so the ratio test gives summability. For , observe that , whereas . Thus for every , so the weights cannot be summable. This also resolves without making an inconclusive appeal to the limiting ratio. Therefore