For a fixed uniformly elliptic operator with coefficients on a bounded smooth connected domain, nonnegative solutions with zero Dirichlet boundary condition satisfy the displayed estimate when is nonempty and compactly contained in . If it failed, normalize the global supremum to one. The forcing and the interior infimum then tend to zero. The global Schauder estimate and compact embedding of Hölder spaces produce a nonzero homogeneous limit with an interior zero, contradicting the strong minimum principle for elliptic operators. An arbitrary bounded zeroth-order coefficient is allowed: replace by for the positivity argument. Keeping global boundary control prevents the normalized maximum from disappearing in the limit.
There is no need to assume that the original zeroth-order coefficient is nonpositive. Set and , and use the uniformly elliptic operator
Because and ,
Now , so the strong minimum principle for elliptic operators applies. If vanished at an interior point of the connected domain, this principle would force to vanish identically. The given nontriviality therefore proves
Every nontrivial nonnegative solution is strictly positive inside. This uses the nondivergence-form strong minimum principle for elliptic operators; the divergence-form Harnack inequality for uniformly elliptic divergence-form equations in part (a) is not being applied to this operator.
Nonnegativity lets us dispense with a sign restriction on . Set and . Then
The strong minimum principle for elliptic operators forces to vanish identically if it has an interior zero. Otherwise it is strictly positive:
Connectedness is part of the usual domain hypothesis; on a disconnected open set this conclusion applies separately to each component.
Take nonempty. If the bound failed, normalization would give nonnegative with supremum one, zero boundary values, , and . The global Schauder estimate bounds them in the Hölder space . By compact embedding of Hölder spaces, a subsequence converges in , , to with , zero boundary data and supremum one.
Points approaching the infima have a subsequence converging in . Uniform convergence gives an interior zero of , and part (c), the strong minimum principle for elliptic operators after replacing by , gives . This contradicts its supremum one, proving
Replacing a minimizer by its absolute value does not increase its gradient norm, so choose a nonnegative minimizer . The Euler-Lagrange equation is
for a Lagrange multiplier . Multiplication by and integration show that
so . Set . Then is nonzero, belongs to , and satisfies the trapped focusing cubic ground-state equation
Standard elliptic regularity and the strong minimum principle for elliptic operators make the nonnegative solution positive.
Fix and . Choose in the Perron family with , replace successive terms by finite maxima using part (i), and take their harmonic lifts on . The lifts remain in the family, are increasing, and are uniformly bounded. Interior estimates and the Arzelà-Ascoli theorem give a harmonic limit on with and .
If somewhere in , take another family member larger than and repeat the maximum-and-lift construction. Its harmonic limit satisfies and . The strong minimum principle for elliptic operators forces , contradicting the strict inequality at . Thus on . Since was arbitrary, is smooth and harmonic in . This is the Perron method for the Dirichlet problem.
Yes. Since and ,
The operator is uniformly elliptic and has nonpositive zeroth-order coefficient. If at an interior point, attains its nonnegative minimum there, so the strong minimum principle for elliptic operators gives on the connected ball .
Strong maximum principle for elliptic operators Created 2026-10-05 Updated 2026-10-06
For a locally uniformly elliptic operator with locally bounded coefficients and , a function satisfying on a connected domain cannot attain a nonnegative global maximum inside unless it is constant. If , the maximum can have either sign. If the maximum set were proper, choose an interior ball in its complement tangent to that set. The Hopf boundary point lemma gives a nonzero normal derivative at the contact point, contradicting the vanishing gradient at an interior maximum.
The strong minimum principle for elliptic operators follows by applying this to . For nonnegative with , replacing by retains the inequality, so the strict positivity-or-zero conclusion does not require an original sign restriction on .